Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1662
Appears in Collections:Economics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The impacts of knowledge of the past on preferences for future landscape change
Author(s): Hanley, Nicholas
Ready, Richard
Colombo, Sergio
Watson, Fiona
Stewart, Mairi
Bergmann, Ariel
Contact Email: n.d.hanley@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: environmental history
landscape values
Landscape assessment Great Britain
Forests and forestry Environmental aspects Scotland
National parks and reserves Trossachs (Scotland)
Issue Date: Mar-2009
Date Deposited: 2-Oct-2009
Citation: Hanley N, Ready R, Colombo S, Watson F, Stewart M & Bergmann A (2009) The impacts of knowledge of the past on preferences for future landscape change. Journal of Environmental Management, 90 (3), pp. 1404-1412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.008
Abstract: In this paper, we investigate whether people's knowledge of the past influences their preferences and values towards future landscape change. “Knowledge of the past” is one aspect of the information set held by individuals, and a well-established finding in economics is that changes in information can change preferences and values. The particular aspects of knowledge of the past we work with here are: (i) awareness of past landuse, as represented by woodland cover and (ii) awareness of differing and sometimes contradictory literary impressions of this past landscape. The case studies used here relate to prospective changes in woodland cover in two UK national parks, the Lake District and the Trossachs. We find that people who are made aware that the landscape has changed over time, or that perceptions of the landscape have changed over time, are more likely to favour changes to the current landscape (are less likely to favour the status quo). Knowledge of the past therefore seems to have an impact on preferences for future landscapes. We also investigate the impacts on preferences of how “special”, how “wild” and how “worked in” people perceive the landscapes of these two national parks to be.
DOI Link: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.08.008
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author; you can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s): http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
YJEMA1935.pdfFulltext - Published Version338.59 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2999-12-15    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.