Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26712
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Maltese translation and adaptation of champion's health belief model scale and the revised illness perception questionnaire for breast screening among maltese women
Author(s): Marmara, Danika
Marmara, Vincent
Hubbard, Gill
Contact Email: d.m.attard@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Breast cancer screening
Champion's Health Belief Model Scale
Reliability
The Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire
Validity
Issue Date: 2017
Date Deposited: 13-Feb-2018
Citation: Marmara D, Marmara V & Hubbard G (2017) Maltese translation and adaptation of champion's health belief model scale and the revised illness perception questionnaire for breast screening among maltese women. Journal of Nursing Measurement, 25 (3), pp. 486-503. https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.486
Abstract: Background and Purpose: Translating, adapting, and piloting Champion's Health Belief Model Scale for Mammography Screening (CHBMS-MS) and Revised Illness Perception Questionnaire (IPQ-R) among Maltese women.  Methods: The Maltese questionnaire (Maltese Breast Screening Questionnaire [MBSQ]) was developed through 9 steps. Bilingual women (n = 15) completed MBSQ at 2 time points.  Results: During forwardbackward translations (Steps 1-4), 4 English controversial terms were raised. Twelve experts agreed on terminologies during adaptation process (Step 5). Following face validity (n = 6; Step 6), 3 items were deleted. Following reconciliation (Step 7) and proofreading (Step 8), MBSQ consisted of 121 items. Pilot testing (Step 9) showed positive correlation (CHBMS-MS = .87, IPQ-R 5 .85; p < .001); high Cronbach's alpha (CHBMS-MS 5 .93, IPQ-R = .92); overall acceptable internal consistency (CHBMS-MS = .69-.83, IPQ-R = .75-.93); and acceptable test-retest reliability correlations: CHBMS-MS (Maltese = .62-.76; English = .61-.84), IPQ-R (Maltese = .63-.82; English = .61-.91; p < .001).  Conclusions: Maltese and English scale items demonstrated high reliability and validity preliminary values.
DOI Link: 10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.486
Rights: The publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository. Published in Journal of Nursing Measurement, 2017, 25(3), pp. 486-503 by Springer Publishing: https://doi.org/10.1891/1061-3749.25.3.486

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Figure 1.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version272.32 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Table 3.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version254.33 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Table 2.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version253.76 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
Table 1.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version254.75 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
FINAL revised Manuscript.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version399.17 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.