Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/26718
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSheaff, Roden_UK
dc.contributor.authorSherriff, Ianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHennessy, Catherineen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2018-03-10T00:09:52Z-
dc.date.available2018-03-10T00:09:52Z-
dc.date.issued2018-02-05en_UK
dc.identifier.other83en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/26718-
dc.description.abstractBackground  Access times for, the costs and overload of hospital services are an increasingly salient issue for healthcare managers in many countries. Rising demand for hospital care has been attributed partly to unplanned admissions for older people, and among these partly to the increasing prevalence of dementia. The paper makes a preliminary evaluation of the logic model of a Dementia Learning Community (DLC) intended to reduce unplanned hospital admissions from care homes of people with dementia. A dementia champion in each DLC care home trained other staff in dementia awareness and change management with the aims of changing work routines, improving quality of life, and reducing demands on external services.  Methods  Controlled mixed methods realistic evaluation comparing 13 intervention homes with 10 controls in England during 2013–15. Each link in the assumed logic model was tested to find whether that link appeared to exist in the DLC sites, and if so whether its effects appeared greater there than in control sites, in terms of selected indicators of quality of life (DCM Well/Ill-Being, QUALID, end-of-life planning); and impacts on ambulance call-outs and hospital admissions.  Results  The training was implemented as planned, and triggered cycles of Plan-Do-Study-Act activity in all the intervention care homes. Residents’ well-being scores, measured by dementia care mapping, improved markedly in half of the intervention homes but not in the other half, where indeed some scores deteriorated markedly. Most other care quality indicators studied did not significantly improve during the study period. Neither did ambulance call-out or emergency hospital admission rates.  Conclusions  PDSA cycles appeared to be the more ‘active ingredient’ in this intervention. The reasons why they impacted on well-being in half of the intervention sites, and not the others, require further research. A larger, longer study would be necessary to measure definitively any impacts on unplanned hospital admissions. Our evidence suggested revising the DLC logic model to include care planning and staff familiarisation with residents’ personal histories and needs as steps towards improving residents’ quality of life.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBioMed Centralen_UK
dc.relationSheaff R, Sherriff I & Hennessy C (2018) Evaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implications. BMC Health Services Research, 18 (1), Art. No.: 83. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12913-018-2894-3en_UK
dc.rights© The Author(s). 2018 This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectDementiaen_UK
dc.subjectDementia Learning Communityen_UK
dc.subjectLogic modelen_UK
dc.subjectPlan-Do-Study-Acten_UK
dc.subjectUnplanned admissionsen_UK
dc.subjectResidential careen_UK
dc.subjectEnglanden_UK
dc.titleEvaluating a dementia learning community: exploratory study and research implicationsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12913-018-2894-3en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid29402291en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMC Health Services Researchen_UK
dc.citation.issn1472-6963en_UK
dc.citation.volume18en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.citation.date05/02/2018en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Plymouthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Plymouthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000424121600003en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85041413961en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid498114en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8905-1343en_UK
dc.date.accepted2018-01-25en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2018-01-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2018-02-15en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSheaff, Rod|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSherriff, Ian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHennessy, Catherine|0000-0002-8905-1343en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2018-02-15en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2018-02-15|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenames12913-018-2894-3.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
s12913-018-2894-3.pdfFulltext - Published Version650.05 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.