Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35254
Appears in Collections:History and Politics Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Contesting Feminist Power Europe: Is Feminist Foreign Policy Possible for the EU?
Author(s): Haastrup, Toni
Guerrina, Roberta
Wright, Katharine
Contact Email: toni.haastrup@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Feminist Power Europe
feminist foreign policy
gender equality
EU
external relations
Date Deposited: 4-Jul-2023
Citation: Haastrup T, Guerrina R & Wright K (2023) Contesting Feminist Power Europe: Is Feminist Foreign Policy Possible for the EU?. <i>European Security</i>. https://doi.org/10.1080/09662839.2023.2233080
Abstract: Since 2014, several European Union (EU) member states have adopted their own versions “Feminist Foreign Policy” (FFP). Increasingly, feminist bureaucrats, politicians, activists, and scholars are calling for the EU to do the same. This article critically scrutinises claims to the feminist actorsness of the EU by introducing the analytical concept of Feminist Power Europe (FPE). In employing FPE as a lens, it examines whether the EU can adopt a FFP and that upholds transformative potential of feminism. Undertaking a critical content analysis of key documents, we identify three overarching feminist frames that emerge in the EU’s external relations policies: 1. Liberal; 2. Intersectional; 3. Postcolonial. We demonstrate that the EU’s propensity for a transformative feminist foreign policy is limited by the setup of global politics and the main drivers of European integration, which continue to be situated in a traditionally masculine environment and are defined by prevailing hierarchies of colonialism and racism. In undertaking this work, we highlight the constraints of advocating for the EU to adopt a FFP. The paper concludes by cautioning against the uncritical deployment of ‘feminism’ in foreign policy articulation within an FPE configuration that excludes reflexivity about the EU’s external relations vision and indeed, its practice.
DOI Link: 10.1080/09662839.2023.2233080
Rights: This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Notes: Output Status: Forthcoming

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2023 - FPE - Revision_300623-Final.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version280.35 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2027-01-04    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.