Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35878
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: The effect of government-public relationships on residents’ support in mega sport events: A moderating effect of government crisis response
Author(s): Kim, Sungkyung
Manoli, Argyro Elisavet
Pyun, Doyoung
Contact Email: sungkyung.kim@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Government-public relationships
crisis response
residents' support
the Olympic Games
mega sport events
public relations
Issue Date: 13-Mar-2024
Date Deposited: 20-Mar-2024
Citation: Kim S, Manoli AE & Pyun D (2024) The effect of government-public relationships on residents’ support in mega sport events: A moderating effect of government crisis response. <i>Leisure Studies</i>. https://doi.org/10.1080/02614367.2024.2328093
Abstract: The study seeks to investigate the role of host governments’ policy public relations and crisis response strategies in shaping residents’ support for mega sport events. Specifically, the research focuses on the moderation effects of crisis response strategies on the relationships between the government-public relationships (GPR) dimensions (i.e., control mutuality, trust, and satisfaction) and residents’ support. The research targeted residents of Tokyo, a host city for the 2020 Olympic and Paralympic Games. Online surveys were disseminated via an international survey company between 23rd to 29th October 2020, obtaining 500 complete responses. Then, a two-step approach was utilised to ensure the tenability of the hypothesised model: CFA for testing the measurement model and SEM for testing the hypothetical relationships. There was a positive association between perceived control mutuality and satisfaction with residents’ support for the mega sport event. The study reaffirmed the importance of control mutuality and satisfaction as GPR indicators for residents’ support, introducing this concept into the mega sport event context. In addition, the relationship between control mutuality and residents’ support was moderated by their perception of the appropriateness of crisis response. Based on the results, theoretical and practical implications were presented.
DOI Link: 10.1080/02614367.2024.2328093
Rights: © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way. The terms on which this article has been published allow the posting of the Accepted Manuscript in a repository by the author(s) or with their consent.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.