<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rdf:RDF xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
  <channel rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35528">
    <title>STORRE Collection: Electronic copies of Law and Philosophy books.</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35528</link>
    <description>Electronic copies of Law and Philosophy books.</description>
    <items>
      <rdf:Seq>
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36961" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35854" />
        <rdf:li rdf:resource="http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35529" />
      </rdf:Seq>
    </items>
    <dc:date>2026-10-04T00:54:26Z</dc:date>
  </channel>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36961">
    <title>Levels of Explanation</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36961</link>
    <description>Title: Levels of Explanation
Editor(s): Robertson, Katie; Wilson, Alastair
Abstract: The different sciences furnish us with a wide variety of explanations: some work at macroscopic scales, some work at microscopic scales, and some operate across different levels. How do these different explanatory levels relate to one another, and what is an explanatory level in the first place? Over the last fifty years, more and more philosophers—both reductionists and anti-reductionists—have no longer subscribed to the idea that the best explanation resides at the fundamental physical level. New challenges arise from the success of scientific explanations employing multi-level models which mix levels of explanation, from distinctive differences between levels structures in biology, cognitive science and social science, from the apparently radical reimagining of the explanatory role of spacetime in our current best theories of fundamental physics, and from the enduring mystery of how higher-level explanations are possible in the first place. These questions naturally connect to classic philosophical ways of thinking about the relations between levels: reduction, emergence and fundamentality. This volume presents a snapshot of cutting-edge research on explanatory levels, from their conceptual foundations to the details of how they are used in scientific practice.</description>
    <dc:date>2024-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35854">
    <title>Modality</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35854</link>
    <description>Title: Modality
Author(s): Roca Royes, Sonia
Abstract: Modality is a vast phenomenon. In fact, it is arguably a plurality of phenomena. Within it, one type of modality warrants distinctive interest in philosophy and, in particular, in metaphysics. In view of this, this Element has a first part devoted to modality as a general phenomenon, where different types of modalities are distinguished, and where the question of unification is raised. Following this, the second part is focused on metaphysical modality: the type of modality that is of distinctive interest in metaphysics, and thus for the series of this Element. In this second part, the overarching question is about the source of metaphysical modality, and the discussion here informs back, and is informed by, the question of unification from the first part. This title is also available as open access on Cambridge Core.</description>
    <dc:date>2023-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
  <item rdf:about="http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35529">
    <title>Internet of Things and the Law: Legal Strategies for Consumer-Centric Smart Technologies</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35529</link>
    <description>Title: Internet of Things and the Law: Legal Strategies for Consumer-Centric Smart Technologies
Author(s): Noto La Diega, Guido
Abstract: Internet of Things and the Law: Legal Strategies for Consumer-Centric Smart Technologies is the most comprehensive and up-to-date analysis of the legal issues in the Internet of Things (IoT). For decades, the decreasing importance of tangible wealth and power – and the increasing significance of their disembodied counterparts – has been the subject of much legal research. For some time now, legal scholars have grappled with how laws drafted for tangible property and predigital ‘offline’ technologies can cope with dematerialisation, digitalisation, and the internet. As dematerialisation continues, this book aims to illuminate the opposite movement: rematerialisation, namely, the return of data, knowledge, and power within a physical ‘smart’ world. This development frames the book’s central question: can the law steer rematerialisation in a human-centric and socially just direction? To answer it, the book focuses on the IoT, the sociotechnological phenomenon that is primarily responsible for this shift. After a thorough analysis of how existing laws can be interpreted to empower IoT end users, Noto La Diega leaves us with the fundamental question of what happens when the law fails us and concludes with a call for collective resistance against ‘smart’ capitalism.</description>
    <dc:date>2022-01-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
  </item>
</rdf:RDF>

