<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>STORRE Collection: Electronic copies of Economics journal articles.</title>
    <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1893/232</link>
    <description>Electronic copies of Economics journal articles.</description>
    <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2026 12:43:15 GMT</pubDate>
    <dc:date>2026-10-25T12:43:15Z</dc:date>
    <item>
      <title>The Hidden Effects of Company Strikes: Workers Made Idle in UK Engineering and Metalworking from 1920 to 1970</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38390</link>
      <description>Title: The Hidden Effects of Company Strikes: Workers Made Idle in UK Engineering and Metalworking from 1920 to 1970
Author(s): Hart, Robert A; Singleton, Carl
Abstract: This study examines a neglected aspect of industrial relations: workplace disputes in which workers are incidentally made idle because of strike actions of others. These spillover effects have received little systematic attention despite potentially accounting for a substantial share of the employment consequences of industrial conflict. The analysis uses a comprehensive dataset of company strikes compiled by the UK Engineering Employers’ Federation (EEF) between 1920 and 1970, recording both workers directly involved in disputes and non-striking employees made idle. During the interwar and wartime periods, relatively few workers were made idle compared with those directly on strike. In contrast, the post-war period saw a substantial rise in the likelihood and scale of incidental idleness. By the late 1960s, the number of EEF workers made idle by strikes nearly matched the hundreds of thousands on strike. Incidental idleness was especially likely when strikes were caused by non-pay disputes, most notably those involving a demarcation disagreement about how workers from different unions or with different trades were assigned to tasks in the plant. These findings highlight wider employment consequences of industrial conflict, especially where there are production interdependencies.</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 13 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38390</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-10-13T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Using agent-based modelling for investigating the impact of travel behaviour interventions on mode shift: A travel behaviour simulation in Dublin</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38330</link>
      <description>Title: Using agent-based modelling for investigating the impact of travel behaviour interventions on mode shift: A travel behaviour simulation in Dublin
Author(s): Lowe, Warnakulasooriya Umesh Ashen; Carroll, Páraic; Lades, Leonhard; Martinez-Pastor, Beatriz
Abstract: The present study examines the impact of various strategic interventions on behavioural changes from private car use to sustainable travel modes in Dublin City, using an agent-based modelling (ABM) approach with a particular focus on soft policy (i.e., cycling promotion campaigns and travel feedback programs) and hard policy (i.e., motor tax and fuel price increments) measures. Utilising the Irish National Household Travel Survey (NHTS), we analysed changes in travel mode share, behavioural stage progression, and CO2 emissions under different policy scenarios. The findings suggest that soft interventions, such as cycling promotion campaigns and travel feedback programs, have consistent impacts on reducing car use, progressing behavioural stages (a shift from lower stages like precontemplation to higher stages like action), and lowering CO₂ emissions, with effects amplified when combined with motor tax and fuel price measures. The findings further highlight that using multiple outcome measures provides a more comprehensive evaluation of the impact, making it valuable for policymakers and decision-makers in assessing different transport policy interventions.</description>
      <pubDate>Thu, 01 Oct 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38330</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-10-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Prompting food safety responsibility: Does it influence consumers’ choices of food safety campaigns?</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38273</link>
      <description>Title: Prompting food safety responsibility: Does it influence consumers’ choices of food safety campaigns?
Author(s): Radu, Madalina; Erdem, Seda; Campbell, Danny
Abstract: Communicating food safety and risk information to consumers is essential to reducing the incidence of foodborne illness. However, despite widespread public health campaigns, behaviour change remains limited. This study investigates whether framing individual responsibility in campaign messages influences consumers’ stated preferences for food safety campaigns. Using a web-based discrete choice experiment with 2343 Scottish adults, participants were randomly assigned to one of three groups: a control group (no prompt), a treatment with a statement-based responsibility prompt or a treatment with a question-based prompt. Respondents completed a series of choice tasks evaluating hypothetical campaigns that varied by delivery channel, timing and message style, alongside an opt-out option (“no campaign”). Results show that question-framed prompts significantly increase the likelihood of choosing a campaign over the opt-out, relative to both the control and statement conditions. While the overall effects are modest in magnitude, they are consistent with prior evidence on the cognitive and motivational impact of question-based framing. These findings suggest that simple, low-cost message framing strategies, particularly those encouraging reflection and self-persuasion, can enhance the perceived effectiveness of public health campaigns and may support improved food safety communication design.</description>
      <pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2026 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38273</guid>
      <dc:date>2026-07-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Estimating present bias and sophistication over effort and money</title>
      <link>http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38269</link>
      <description>Title: Estimating present bias and sophistication over effort and money
Author(s): Cerrone, Claudia; Chakraborty, Anujit; Kim, Hyok Jung; Lades, Leonhard K.
Abstract: We design and conduct a real-effort experiment to jointly estimate present bias and sophistication across effort and monetary domains. Unlike prior work (e.g.,Augenblick and Rabin, 2019; Fedyk, 2024), we do not assume that these parameters are identical across domains. We explain and empirically demonstrate how assuming identical sophistication across money and effort domains can bias the estimates of key parameters. In our online experiment, participants chose to (predicted to) complete 14% (10%) fewer tasks on the same day than on a future day, leading to an estimated present bias () over effort of 0.70–0.79, and an estimated sophistication () of 0.80–0.88. For money, aggregate present bias () is near zero, but there is substantial heterogeneity, with roughly equal numbers of participants exhibiting present bias and future bias. At the individual level, roughly three quarters of all participants correctly anticipate the direction of their bias in both domains, even if not its full magnitude.</description>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Nov 2025 00:00:00 GMT</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="false">http://hdl.handle.net/1893/38269</guid>
      <dc:date>2025-11-01T00:00:00Z</dc:date>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

