Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/11504
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hong-Linen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-05-15T23:10:17Z-
dc.date.available2013-05-15T23:10:17Z-
dc.date.issued2013en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/11504-
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: This article considers the issue of an oral arbitration agreement in relation to the New York Convention. As Townsend once said "[a]rbitration offers a means to an end, and the end is to the resolution of disputes." This end would be extremely difficult to achieve without the approval of national courts. Fortunately, with 146 signatory countries signed on the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards 1958 (The New York Convention), the success of this Convention has attracted businessmen into using arbitration to resolve their disputes. Nevertheless, a voluntary arbitration cannot be commenced without a valid arbitration agreement. Setting out to achieve harmonisation in the enforcement of arbitration agreements, art.II of the New York Convention provides the written requirements to be followed by all 146 signatory countries. Accordingly, written requirements for arbitration are imposed upon all signatory countries and they are obliged under the convention to recognise all arbitration agreements which are made in writing.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwellen_UK
dc.relationYu H (2013) Written Arbitration Agreements – What Written Arbitration Agreements?. Civil Justice Quarterly, 32 (1), pp. 68-93.en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher has granted permission for use of this work in this Repository.en_UK
dc.subjectArbitration agreementsen_UK
dc.subjectComparative lawen_UK
dc.subjectFranceen_UK
dc.subjectNew York Convention awardsen_UK
dc.subjectNew Zealanden_UK
dc.subjectOral contractsen_UK
dc.subjectScotlanden_UK
dc.titleWritten Arbitration Agreements – What Written Arbitration Agreements?en_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleCivil Justice Quarterlyen_UK
dc.citation.issn0261-9261en_UK
dc.citation.volume32en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage68en_UK
dc.citation.epage93en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailh.l.yu@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid724685en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2013-12-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-03-25en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorYu, Hong-Lin|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2013-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2013-12-31en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2013-12-31|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename2013_32_CJQ_Issue_1_Print_Yu.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0261-9261en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2013_32_CJQ_Issue_1_Print_Yu.pdfFulltext - Published Version780.52 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.