1. STORRE
  2. Faculty of Arts and Humanities
  3. Law and Philosophy
  4. Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/17941
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hong-Linen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2013-12-20T23:10:34Z-
dc.date.available2013-12-20T23:10:34Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2011en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/17941-
dc.description.abstractExplores the Belgian, Swiss and US attitudes towards the relationship between the statutory grounds for recognition and enforcement of arbitral awards under domestic law and the contractual agreement between the parties to an arbitration to restrict or expand the grounds for recognising and enforcing such awards, in order to assess the extent to which party autonomy may be stretched.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSweet and Maxwellen_UK
dc.relationYu H (2011) How far can party autonomy be stretched in setting the grounds for the refusal of arbitral awards. International Arbitration Law Review, 14 (5), pp. 156-161.en_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher has not yet responded to our queries therefore this work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectAutonomyen_UK
dc.subjectAwardsen_UK
dc.subjectBelgiumen_UK
dc.subjectComparative lawen_UK
dc.subjectEnforcementen_UK
dc.subjectRecognitionen_UK
dc.subjectSwitzerlanden_UK
dc.subjectUnited Statesen_UK
dc.titleHow far can party autonomy be stretched in setting the grounds for the refusal of arbitral awardsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-12-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Hong-Lin Yu Int ALR 2011.pdf] The publisher has not yet responded to our queries. This work cannot be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleInternational Arbitration Law Reviewen_UK
dc.citation.issn1367-8272en_UK
dc.citation.volume14en_UK
dc.citation.issue5en_UK
dc.citation.spage156en_UK
dc.citation.epage161en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailh.l.yu@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid707801en_UK
dc.date.accepted2011-07-01en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2011-07-01en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2013-12-20en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorYu, Hong-Lin|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-12-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameHong-Lin Yu Int ALR 2011.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1367-8272en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Hong-Lin Yu Int ALR 2011.pdfFulltext - Published Version279.74 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-12-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright

View License
Show simple item record


Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.