Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30251
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Implementation of sit-stand desks as a workplace health initiative: stakeholder views |
Author(s): | Hall, Jennifer Kay, Tess McConnell, Alison K Mansfield, Louise |
Keywords: | Qualitative Organisational culture Physical activity Acceptability Feasibility Sedentary behaviour |
Issue Date: | 2019 |
Date Deposited: | 7-Oct-2019 |
Citation: | Hall J, Kay T, McConnell AK & Mansfield L (2019) Implementation of sit-stand desks as a workplace health initiative: stakeholder views. International Journal of Workplace Health Management, 12 (5), pp. 369-386. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-02-2019-0026 |
Abstract: | Purpose Prolonged workplace sitting can harm employee health. Sit-stand desks are a potential workplace health initiative that might reduce and break up the time office-based employees spend sitting in the workplace. However, little is known about the feasibility and acceptability of providing sit-stand desks. The paper aims to discuss this issue. Design/methodology/approach The present study sought stakeholder employee views surrounding sit-stand desk implementation within two UK-based non-profit organisations with open-plan offices. This paper draws on qualitative semi-structured interviews with 26 stakeholder employees and 65 days of participant observations. Data were analysed using thematic analysis, and organisational cultural theory framed the study. Findings Stakeholders employees’ positioning of sit-stand desks as a workplace health initiative reflected their perceptions of the relationship between sit-stand desk provision, employee health and organisational effectiveness. Perceptions were shaped by the nature and context of the organisation and by occupation-specific processes. Relatively fixed (e.g. organisational structure) and modifiable (e.g. selecting products compatible with the environment) factors were found to restrict and facilitate the perceived feasibility of implementing sit-stand desks. Practical implications The findings offer several recommendations for workplaces to improve stakeholder employee attitudes towards sit-stand desk provision and to increase the ease and efficiency of implementation. Originality/value Whilst extant literature has tended to examine hypothetical views related to sit-stand desk provision, this study consulted relevant stakeholders following, and regarding, the sit-stand desk implementation process. |
DOI Link: | 10.1108/IJWHM-02-2019-0026 |
Rights: | Publisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in International Journal of Workplace Health Management by Emerald. The original publication is available at: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJWHM-02-2019-0026. This article is deposited under the Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial International Licence 4.0 (CC BY-NC 4.0). Any reuse is allowed in accordance with the terms outlined by the licence (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/). To reuse the AAM for commercial purposes, permission should be sought by contacting permissions@emeraldinsight.com. |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Hall-etal-IJWHM-2019.pdf | Fulltext - Accepted Version | 407.04 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.