Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31630
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hong-Linen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-09-03T00:07:25Z-
dc.date.available2020-09-03T00:07:25Z-
dc.date.issued2021-02-11en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31630-
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: Commercial arbitration is frequently said to be private and confidential. Confidentiality is often pointed out as one of the main advantages and reasons why the parties have chosen arbitration as the means of resolving commercial disputes. This widely acknowledged characteristic has led the parties to believe that they can keep their disputes from the gaze of the outside world and potential court proceedings at the enforcement stage. As the 2010 Study on Confidentiality demonstrated ‘50% of respondents erroneously believe that arbitration is confidential even where there is no specific clause to that effect in the arbitration rules adopted or the arbitration agreement and 12% did not know whether arbitration is confidential in these circumstances.’en_UK
dc.language.isozhen_UK
dc.relationYu H (2021) The Duty of Confidentiality Within The Global Landscape. Chinese Arbitration Association. CAA Newsletter. Taipei. http://caa-epaper.arbitration.org.tw/paper_detail.aspx?ID=2db0413a-b8af-4632-b8d5-ea2cb139448ben_UK
dc.relation.ispartofseriesCAA Newsletteren_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.titleThe Duty of Confidentiality Within The Global Landscapeen_UK
dc.typeConsultancy Reporten_UK
dc.contributor.sponsorChinese Arbitration Associationen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2021-02-11en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Final CAA Report on Confidentiality 2020-07-27.pdf] Until this work is published there will be an embargo on the full text of this work.en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://caa-epaper.arbitration.org.tw/paper_detail.aspx?ID=2db0413a-b8af-4632-b8d5-ea2cb139448ben_UK
dc.author.emailh.l.yu@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date11/02/2021en_UK
dc.publisher.addressTaipeien_UK
dc.description.notesEnglish version is available at: http://caa-epaper.arbitration.org.tw/paper_detail.aspx?ID=d73c25a2-c3bc-41eb-9a50-55be3cfe6af0en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1657578en_UK
dc.date.accepted2020-09-01en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2020-09-01en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-09-02en_UK
rioxxterms.typeConsultancy Reporten_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorYu, Hong-Lin|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2021-02-11en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2021-02-11en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2021-02-11|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameFinal CAA Report on Confidentiality 2020-07-27.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Reports and Discussion Papers

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Final CAA Report on Confidentiality 2020-07-27.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version899.28 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.