Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32617
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Negotiating safety and vulnerability in everyday life: perspectives of UK older people from participative research
Author(s): Sherwood-Johnson, Fiona
Mackay, Kathryn
Greasley-Adams, Corinne
Keywords: Safety
vulnerability
protection
participation
older people
Issue Date: 2022
Date Deposited: 18-May-2021
Citation: Sherwood-Johnson F, Mackay K & Greasley-Adams C (2022) Negotiating safety and vulnerability in everyday life: perspectives of UK older people from participative research. European Journal of Social Work, 25 (3), pp. 485-496. https://doi.org/10.1080/13691457.2021.1882397
Abstract: This article reports on a participative study that began to explore what safety and vulnerability mean to older people and the resources they draw on to keep themselves safe. The methodology was designed in collaboration with an independent advocacy organisation and ten of its older members, who were also research participants. It involved focus groups and repeated visits to five participants to discuss their daily lives. The findings indicate that "safety" and "vulnerability" have subjective, experiential dimensions, which are situated in particular relationships, environments and experiences over time. Participants reported drawing on their own strengths and the strengths of others in their families, communities and local services to achieve an acceptable level of felt safety for themselves. However, this sense of safety could not be disentangled from, nor always prioritised over, wider aspects of living well including maintaining reciprocal relationships, preserving self-identity, and contributing to the well-being of families and other social groups of which they felt themselves a part. Implications are considered in light of UK and wider European policy aspirations to support both autonomy and safety: specifically, the need to foster supportive communities, to offer low-level support and to pay attention to what safety means to each individual.
DOI Link: 10.1080/13691457.2021.1882397
Rights: © 2021 The Author(s). Published by Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
EJSW final submitted version with table.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version861.39 kBAdobe PDFView/Open
13691457.2021.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.27 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.