Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32854
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ashton, Natalie Alana | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Cruft, Rowan | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2021-07-06T00:07:22Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2021-07-06T00:07:22Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2021-12 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/32854 | - |
dc.description.abstract | This article critically evaluates what we call the ‘popular narrative’ about the state of the public sphere. We identify three elements of this popular narrative (the post-truth element, the polarisation element and the new technology element), and draw on philosophical work on hinge epistemology and social roles to challenge each one. We propose, instead, that public debate has always depended on non-evidential commitments, that it has always been home to significant, deep division, and that social media, rather than causing these phenomena, has just made them more visible. Finally, we recommend some changes to traditional and social media which we believe would help foster a healthier, more inclusive, public sphere. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_UK |
dc.relation | Ashton NA & Cruft R (2021) Rethinking the Post-Truth Polarisation Narrative: Social Roles and Hinge Commitments in the Plural Public Sphere. Political Quarterly, 92 (4), pp. 598-605. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-923x.13032 | en_UK |
dc.rights | © 2021 The Authors. The Political Quarterly published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Political Quarterly Publishing Co (PQPC). This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | post-truth | en_UK |
dc.subject | polarisation | en_UK |
dc.subject | social media | en_UK |
dc.subject | hinge epistemology | en_UK |
dc.subject | evidence | en_UK |
dc.subject | social roles | en_UK |
dc.title | Rethinking the Post-Truth Polarisation Narrative: Social Roles and Hinge Commitments in the Plural Public Sphere | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/1467-923x.13032 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Political Quarterly | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1467-923X | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0032-3179 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 92 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 4 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 598 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 605 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 03/07/2021 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Philosophy | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Philosophy | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000669246100001 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85109026914 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1739925 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2021-06-30 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2021-06-30 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2021-07-05 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | paid | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Ashton, Natalie Alana| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Cruft, Rowan| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2021-07-05 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2021-07-05| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | 1467-923X.13032.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1467-923X | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Law and Philosophy Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1467-923X.13032.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 90.54 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.