|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections|
|Title:||Extended Rationality and Epistemic Relativism|
|Author(s):||Ashton, Natalie Alana|
Pedersen, Nikolaj Jang Lee Linding
|Citation:||Ashton NA (2021) Extended Rationality and Epistemic Relativism. In: Moretti L & Pedersen NJLL (eds.) Non-Evidentialist Epistemology. Brill Studies in Skepticism, 3. Leiden: Brill, pp. 55-72. https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004465534_004|
|Series/Report no.:||Brill Studies in Skepticism, 3|
|Abstract:||In her book Extended Rationality: A Hinge Epistemology (2015), Annalisa Coliva distances her positive anti-sceptical proposal from what she calls “devastating” relativist interpretations (2015: 120). She proposes two ways someone might attempt to formulate epistemic relativism from her positive view, and argues that both fail because they rely on alternative conceptions of rationality which are either “unintelligible” or “inconceivable”. In this chapter I do three things. First, I highlight problems with Coliva’s arguments against relativism; she fails to show that the conception of rationality needed for the first formulation of relativism is unintelligible, and overestimates the significance of the second’s turning out to be inconceivable. Second, I reveal a deeper problem; neither formulation follows a realistic blueprint for relativism, so these weren’t the right possibilities to consider. Finally, I suggest a more plausible relativist formulation that could be based on Coliva’s view, leaving open whether or not it is successful.|
|Rights:||The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|9789004398955_05-Ashton.pdf||Fulltext - Published Version||1.73 MB||Adobe PDF||Under Permanent Embargo Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.