Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33875
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorCronin, Lorcanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMarchant, Daviden_UK
dc.contributor.authorAllen, Justineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHuntley, Emmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJohnson, Lauraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKosteli, Maria Christinaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHollis, Annaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEllison, Paulen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-01-25T01:09:07Z-
dc.date.available2022-01-25T01:09:07Z-
dc.date.issued2019-12-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/33875-
dc.description.abstractObjectives: This study investigated whether basic needs satisfaction versus frustration mediated the relationships between autonomy-supportive versus controlling coaching and participants’ life skills development in youth sport. Design: This descriptive study used a cross-sectional research design. To ensure a diverse sample, participants were recruited from a wide range of sports. Methods: British and Irish youth sport participants (N = 309) completed measures of autonomy-supportive and controlling coaching, basic need satisfaction versus frustration (autonomy, competence, and relatedness), and life skills development in sport (teamwork, goal setting, social skills, problem solving, emotional skills, leadership, time management, and communication skills). Results: Correlational analyses showed that coach autonomy support was positively related to participants’ basic need satisfaction and life skills development. Controlling coaching was only positively associated with participants’ basic need frustration. Mediational analyses revealed that satisfaction of the three needs combined mediated the relationships between coach autonomy support and participants’ development of all eight life skills. Relatedness satisfaction mediated the relationships between coach autonomy support and participants’ development of all life skills except for goal setting. Autonomy satisfaction only mediated the relationships between coach autonomy support and time management; whereas, competence satisfaction mediated the relationships between coach autonomy support and participants’ goal setting and emotional skills. Conclusions: Findings indicated that basic need satisfaction is a mechanism that helps explain the relationships between coach autonomy support and sport participants’ life skills development. As such, coaches should create an autonomy-supportive climate that satisfies participants’ three basic needs and may help to develop their life skills.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.relationCronin L, Marchant D, Allen J, Huntley E, Johnson L, Kosteli MC, Hollis A & Ellison P (2019) How the Bright and Dark Side of Self-Determination Theory Influence Participants' Life Skills Development in Youth Sport. British Psychological Society - Division of Sport & Exercise Psychology 2019 Conference, Solihull, UK, 02.12.2019-03.12.2019.en_UK
dc.rightsAuthors retain copyright. Proper attribution of authorship and correct citation details should be given.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.titleHow the Bright and Dark Side of Self-Determination Theory Influence Participants' Life Skills Development in Youth Sporten_UK
dc.typeConference Paperen_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusUnpublisheden_UK
dc.type.statusAO - Author's Originalen_UK
dc.author.emailjustine.allen@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.conferencedates2019-12-02 - 2019-12-03en_UK
dc.citation.conferencelocationSolihull, UKen_UK
dc.citation.conferencenameBritish Psychological Society - Division of Sport & Exercise Psychology 2019 Conferenceen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdge Hill Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdge Hill Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSporten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdge Hill Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdge Hill Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdge Hill Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdge Hill Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationEdge Hill Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1788825en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9918-9330en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-12-02en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate1900-01-01en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeConference Paper/Proceeding/Abstracten_UK
rioxxterms.versionAOen_UK
local.rioxx.authorCronin, Lorcan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMarchant, David|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAllen, Justine|0000-0001-9918-9330en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHuntley, Emma|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJohnson, Laura|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKosteli, Maria Christina|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHollis, Anna|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEllison, Paul|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-01-21en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2022-01-21|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameDSEPPresentation2019-LorcanCronin.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Conference Papers and Proceedings

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
DSEPPresentation2019-LorcanCronin.pdfSlides315.92 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.