|Appears in Collections:||Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections|
|Title:||A Human Rights Lens: Reclaiming the Narrative for Social Rights as Legal Rights|
|Citation:||Boyle K & Camps D (2022) A Human Rights Lens: Reclaiming the Narrative for Social Rights as Legal Rights. In: Adler M (ed.) A Research Agenda for Social Welfare Law, Policy, Practice and Impact. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. https://www.e-elgar.com/shop/gbp/a-research-agenda-for-social-welfare-law-policy-and-practice-9781800886322.html|
|Abstract:||This chapter seeks to outline a future research agenda for social rights that (a) reclaims social rights as legal rights and (b) exposes the structural flaws that undermine the recognition of social rights as legal rights. We draw upon recent insights and interdisciplinary methods that have significant potential when applied to social welfare law, policy and practice across the UK. We argue that to build a future research agenda for social welfare law using a human rights lens requires a two-stage approach. First, we contend that research must address the systemic and structural inadequacy of the legal recognition of social rights as legal rights and continue to propose solutions to close this gap. Second, we suggest that adopting a critical interdisciplinary lens helps make visible how underlying systemic and structural issues have led to exclusionary practices in the enjoyment of social rights. By addressing the former, we direct the research agenda towards reclaiming the narrative for social rights as justiciable (enforceable legal) rights in and of themselves. In addressing the latter, we deploy a critical discourse lens that shapes the research agenda in ways that mobilise counter discourses to subvert dominant valuation discourses, which classify certain groups of people as ‘undeserving’ of social rights and dignity.|
|Rights:||This item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.|
|chapter - Boyle and Camps - SUBMITTED.pdf||Fulltext - Accepted Version||300.77 kB||Adobe PDF||View/Open|
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.