Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34474
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorStead, Martineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFord, Allisonen_UK
dc.contributor.authorEadie, Douglasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBiggs, Hannahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorElliott, Claireen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUssher, Michaelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBedford, Helenen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAngus, Kathrynen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHunt, Kateen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMacKintosh, Anne Marieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorJessop, Curtisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMacGregor, Andyen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-06-30T00:00:52Z-
dc.date.available2022-06-30T00:00:52Z-
dc.date.issued2022-06-03en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34474-
dc.description.abstractBackground Debate is ongoing about mandating COVID-19 vaccination to maximise uptake. Policymakers must consider whether to mandate, for how long, and in which contexts, taking into account not only legal and ethical questions but also public opinion. Implementing mandates among populations who oppose them could be counterproductive. Methods Qualitative telephone interviews (Feb-May 2021) with British adults explored views on vaccine passports and mandatory vaccination. Participants (n = 50) were purposively selected from respondents to a probability-based national survey of attitudes to COVID-19 vaccination, to include those expressing vaccine-hesitancy. Data were analysed thematically. Findings Six themes were identified in participants’ narratives concerning mandates: (i) mandates are a necessary and proportionate response for some occupations to protect the vulnerable and facilitate the resumption of free movement; (ii) mandates undermine autonomy and choice; (iii) mandates represent an over-reach of state power; (iv) mandates could potentially create ‘vaccine apartheid’; (v) the importance of context and framing; and (vi) mandates present considerable feasibility challenges. Those refusing vaccination tended to argue strongly against mandates. However, those in favour of vaccination also expressed concerns about freedom of choice, state coercion and social divisiveness. Discussion To our knowledge, this is the first in-depth UK study of public views on COVID-19 vaccine mandates. It does not assess support for different mandates but explores emotions, principles and reasoning underpinning views. Our data suggest that debate around mandates can arouse strong concerns and could entrench scepticism. Policymakers should proceed with caution. While surveys can provide snapshots of opinion on mandates, views are complex and further consultation is needed regarding specific scenarios.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationStead M, Ford A, Eadie D, Biggs H, Elliott C, Ussher M, Bedford H, Angus K, Hunt K, MacKintosh AM, Jessop C & MacGregor A (2022) A "step too far" or "perfect sense"? A qualitative study of British adults' views on mandating COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine passports. Vaccine. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.072en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectCOVID-19en_UK
dc.subjectVaccineen_UK
dc.subjectMandatory vaccinationen_UK
dc.subjectVaccine passportsen_UK
dc.subjectQualitativeen_UK
dc.subjectPublic attitudesen_UK
dc.titleA "step too far" or "perfect sense"? A qualitative study of British adults' views on mandating COVID-19 vaccination and vaccine passportsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.vaccine.2022.05.072en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid35773124en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleVaccineen_UK
dc.citation.issn0264-410Xen_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderUKRI UK Research and Innovationen_UK
dc.author.emailkathryn.angus@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date03/06/2022en_UK
dc.description.notesOutput Status: Forthcoming/Available Onlineen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNatCen Social Research (NatCen)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNatCen Social Research (NatCen)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNatCen Social Research (NatCen)en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNatCen Social Research (NatCen)en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85133169515en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1826182en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-3066-4604en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5503-9610en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0908-1380en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5351-4422en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5873-3632en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7150-7031en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-05-23en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-05-23en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-06-29en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectOptimising General Public Uptake of a Covid-19 Vaccine: A Mixed Methods Study (OPTIUMUM)en_UK
dc.relation.funderrefES/V012851/1en_UK
dc.subject.tagQualitative Research Methodsen_UK
dc.subject.tagCOVID-19en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorStead, Martine|0000-0002-3066-4604en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFord, Allison|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorEadie, Douglas|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBiggs, Hannah|0000-0002-5503-9610en_UK
local.rioxx.authorElliott, Claire|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUssher, Michael|0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBedford, Helen|0000-0003-0908-1380en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAngus, Kathryn|0000-0002-5351-4422en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHunt, Kate|0000-0002-5873-3632en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMacKintosh, Anne Marie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorJessop, Curtis|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMacGregor, Andy|0000-0002-7150-7031en_UK
local.rioxx.projectES/V012851/1|UK Research and Innovation|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100014013en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-06-29en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/|2022-06-29|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0264410X2200696X-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0264-410Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0264410X2200696X-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version360.2 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.