|Appears in Collections:||Faculty of Social Sciences eTheses|
|Title:||A curriculum for equity? Changing notions of equity in educational policy and Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence|
|Author(s):||Edgar, Stephen Thomas|
curriculum for excellence
|Publisher:||University of Stirling|
|Abstract:||Within the social sciences, the term equity has a helpful and precise meaning - referring to a differentiated response to an individual’s own distinct needs or circumstances. However, since the 2000s ‘equity’ has been recontextualised within national and international education policymaking as a generic term. This recontextualisation has led to ‘equity’ being used uncritically to refer to a range of related, and often contradictory, concepts. The focus on ‘equity’ is also a notable feature of current Scottish education policy. This thesis explores the implications of a wider focus on ‘equity’ for Scotland’s Curriculum for Excellence (CfE) policy. It takes a mixed methods approach: firstly, by using Corpus Linguistics to analyse the use of the term ‘equity’ in CfE policy texts since 2004, and, secondly, by interviewing policymakers with responsibility for authoring those policies. This innovative approach allows a detailed consideration of what interpretations of ‘equity’ have been advanced within CfE policy, and how these have changed over time. My analysis shows that, influenced largely by a change in political leadership, explicit consideration of ‘equity’ within CfE policy has increased since 2014-15. However, recent changes to the technical form of CfE policy, driven by ongoing cultures of performativity, may have narrowed the scope for the kind of adaptive teacher professionalism which is most likely to support the realisation of equity. Based on this analysis, I emphasise the value of the concept of equity in informing both curriculum policy and practice in Scotland. However, I urge caution in the uncritical use of ‘equity’ within education policy. I argue that there is a need for the education policy community in Scotland to develop a more nuanced view of what the term means for the curriculum - as well as the ways in which wider education policy may help or hinder its realisation.|
|Type:||Thesis or Dissertation|
|S Edgar Thesis Submitted 6 August 2022.pdf||3.72 MB||Adobe PDF||Under Embargo until 2024-08-07 Request a copy|
Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.
This item is protected by original copyright
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.