Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35295
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorDumbrell, Joshen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDaneshvar, Hadien_UK
dc.contributor.authorOteo, Albertoen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBaldacchino, Alexanderen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMatheson, Catrionaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2023-08-24T00:22:06Z-
dc.date.available2023-08-24T00:22:06Z-
dc.date.issued2023-03-26en_UK
dc.identifier.other40en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35295-
dc.description.abstractBackground Opioids were implicated in approximately 88,000 fatal overdoses (OD) globally. However, in principle all opioid OD are reversible with the timely administration of naloxone hydrochloride. Despite the widespread availability of naloxone among people who use opioids (PWUO), many who suffer fatal OD use alone, without others present to administer the reversal agent. Recognising this key aspect of the challenge calls for innovations, a number of technological approaches have emerged which aim to connect OD victims with naloxone. However, the acceptability of OD response technologies to PWUO is of key concern. Methods Drawing on the Technology People Organisations Macroenvironment (TPOM) framework, this study sought to integrate acceptability-related findings in this space with primary research data from PWUO, affected family members and service providers to understand the factors involved in harm reduction technology acceptability. A qualitative study using a focus group methodology was conducted. The participant groups were people with lived experience of problem opioid use, affected family members and service providers. Data analysis followed a multi-stage approach to thematic analysis and utilised both inductive and deductive methods. Results Thirty individuals participated in one of six focus groups between November 2021 and September 2022. The analysis generated six major themes, three of which are reported in this article—selected for their close relevance to PWUO and their importance to developers of digital technologies for this group. ‘Trust—in technologies, systems and people’ was a major theme and was closely linked to data security, privacy and confidentiality. ‘Balancing harm reduction, safety and ambivalence’ reflects the delicate balance technological solutions must achieve to be acceptable to PWUO. Lastly, ‘readiness—a double bind’ encapsulates the perception shared across participant groups, that those at the highest risk, may be the least able to engage with interventions. Conclusion Effective digital strategies to prevent fatal OD must be sensitive to the complex relationships between technological, social/human, organisational and wider macroenvironmental factors which can enable or impede intervention delivery. Trust, readiness and performance are central to technology acceptability for PWUO. An augmented TPOM was developed (the TPOM-ODART).en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherSpringer Science and Business Media LLCen_UK
dc.relationDumbrell J, Daneshvar H, Oteo A, Baldacchino A & Matheson C (2023) The acceptability of overdose alert and response technologies: introducing the TPOM-ODART framework. <i>Harm Reduction Journal</i>, 20, Art. No.: 40. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12954-023-00763-4en_UK
dc.rightsOpen Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the dataen_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectOpioidsen_UK
dc.subjectPeople who use opioids (PWUO)en_UK
dc.subjectOverdose (OD)en_UK
dc.subjectPublic healthen_UK
dc.subjectHarm reductionen_UK
dc.subjectOverdose alert and response technologies (ODART)en_UK
dc.subjectTPOM-ODARTen_UK
dc.subjectOverdose digital technologiesen_UK
dc.titleThe acceptability of overdose alert and response technologies: introducing the TPOM-ODART frameworken_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1186/s12954-023-00763-4en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid36967388en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleHarm Reduction Journalen_UK
dc.citation.issn1477-7517en_UK
dc.citation.volume20en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderScottish Governmenten_UK
dc.author.emailhadi.daneshvar@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date26/03/2023en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDementia and Ageingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationFaculty of Social Sciencesen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000957037500001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85151044888en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1911456en_UK
dc.date.accepted2023-03-03en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-03-03en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2023-06-20en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorDumbrell, Josh|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDaneshvar, Hadi|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOteo, Alberto|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBaldacchino, Alexander|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMatheson, Catriona|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Scottish Government|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100012095en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2023-06-20en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2023-06-20|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameacceptablityofoverdose.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Social Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
acceptablityofoverdose.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.08 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.