Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35728
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRazai, Mohammad Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMansour, Raniaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGoldsmith, Lucyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Samuelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMason-Apps, Charlotteen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRavindran, Pahalavien_UK
dc.contributor.authorKooner, Pavanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBerendes, Simaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Joanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMajeed, Azeemen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUssher, Michaelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHargreaves, Sallyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOakeshott, Pippaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2024-02-22T01:10:33Z-
dc.date.available2024-02-22T01:10:33Z-
dc.date.issued2023-12en_UK
dc.identifier.othertaad138en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35728-
dc.description.abstractBackground: Pregnant women and their babies face significant risks from three vaccine-preventable diseases: COVID-19, influenza, and pertussis. However, despite these vaccines' proven safety and effectiveness, vaccine uptake during pregnancy remains low. Methods: We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42023399488; January 2012 – December 2022 following PRISMA guidelines) of interventions to increase COVID-19/influenza/pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. We searched nine databases, including grey literature. Two independent investigators extracted data; discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models to estimate pooled effect sizes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistics. Results: Out of 2681 articles, we identified 39 relevant studies (n=168,262 participants) across nine countries. Fifteen studies (39%) were randomised controlled trials (RCTs); the remainder were observational cohort, quality-improvement or cross-sectional studies. The quality of 18% (7/39) was strong. Pooled results of interventions to increase influenza vaccine uptake (18 effect estimates from 12 RCTs) showed the interventions were effective but had a small effect (Risk ratio = 1.07, 95%CI 1.03, 1.13). However, pooled results of interventions to increase pertussis vaccine uptake (10 effect estimates from six RCTs) showed no clear benefit (Risk ratio = 0.98, 95%CI 0.94, 1.03). There were no relevant RCTs for COVID-19. Interventions addressed the “three Ps”: patient-, provider- and policy-level strategies. At patient level, clear recommendations from healthcare professionals backed by text reminders/written information were strongly associated with increased vaccine uptake, especially tailored face-to-face interventions, which addressed women’s concerns, dispelled myths and highlighted the benefits. Provider-level interventions included educating healthcare professionals about vaccines’ safety and effectiveness and reminders to offer vaccinations routinely. Policy-level interventions included financial incentives, mandatory vaccination data fields in electronic health records, and ensuring easy availability of vaccinations. Conclusions: Interventions had a small effect on increasing influenza vaccination. Training healthcare providers to promote vaccinations during pregnancy is crucial, and could be enhanced by utilising mobile health technologies.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherOxford University Press (OUP)en_UK
dc.relationRazai MS, Mansour R, Goldsmith L, Freeman S, Mason-Apps C, Ravindran P, Kooner P, Berendes S, Morris J, Majeed A, Ussher M, Hargreaves S & Oakeshott P (2023) Interventions to increase vaccination against COVID-19, influenza and pertussis during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <i>Journal of Travel Medicine</i>, 30 (8), Art. No.: taad138. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taad138en_UK
dc.rightsThis article is available under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license and permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectVaccine hesitancyen_UK
dc.subjectstrategiesen_UK
dc.subjectmaternal immunizationen_UK
dc.subjectvaccine confidenceen_UK
dc.subjectpublic policyen_UK
dc.subjectantenatal careen_UK
dc.subjectmaternal healthen_UK
dc.titleInterventions to increase vaccination against COVID-19, influenza and pertussis during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysisen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1093/jtm/taad138en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid37934788en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Travel Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn1708-8305en_UK
dc.citation.issn1195-1982en_UK
dc.citation.volume30en_UK
dc.citation.issue8en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderAA Enviroen_UK
dc.author.emailaileen.paton@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date02/11/2023en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrighton And Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationWest London and Broadmoor NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicineen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationImperial College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:001102125000001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85181396185en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1967070en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
dc.date.accepted2023-10-22en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2023-10-22en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2024-02-16en_UK
dc.subject.tagCOVID-19en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRazai, Mohammad S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMansour, Rania|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGoldsmith, Lucy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFreeman, Samuel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMason-Apps, Charlotte|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRavindran, Pahalavi|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKooner, Pavan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBerendes, Sima|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMorris, Joan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMajeed, Azeem|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUssher, Michael|0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHargreaves, Sally|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOakeshott, Pippa|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|AA Enviro|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2024-02-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2024-02-16|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenametaad138.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1708-8305en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
taad138.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.7 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.