Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35831
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Ayers, Susan | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Sinesi, Andrea | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Coates, Rose | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Cheyne, Helen | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Maxwell, Margaret | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Best, Cath | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | McNicol, Stacey | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Williams, Louise R | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Uddin, Nazihah | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Shakespeare, Judy | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Alderdice, Fiona | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2024-03-07T01:07:18Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2024-03-07T01:07:18Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-04 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.other | 102841 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35831 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: For screening for anxiety during pregnancy and after birth to be efficient and effective it is important to know the optimal time to screen in order to identify women who might benefit from treatment. Aims: To determine the optimal time to screen for perinatal anxiety to identify women with anxiety disorders and those who want treatment. A secondary aim was to examine the stability and course of perinatal anxiety over time. Methods: Prospective longitudinal cohort study of 2243 women who completed five screening questionnaires of anxiety and mental health symptoms in early pregnancy (11 weeks), mid-pregnancy (23 weeks), late pregnancy (32 weeks) and postnatally (8 weeks). Anxiety and mental health questionnaires were the GAD7, GAD2, SAAS, CORE-10 and Whooley questions. To establish presence of anxiety disorders diagnostic interviews were con ducted with a subsample of 403 participants. Results: Early pregnancy was the optimal time to screen for anxiety to identify women with anxiety disorders and women wanting treatment at any time during pregnancy or postnatally. These findings were consistent across all five questionnaires of anxiety and mental health. Receiving treatment for perinatal mental health problems was most strongly associated with late pregnancy and/or postnatal assessments. Anxiety symptoms were highest in early pregnancy and decreased over time. Conclusion: Findings show that screening in early pregnancy is optimal for identifying women who have, or develop, anxiety disorders and who want treatment. This has clear implications for practice and policy for anxiety screening during the perinatal period. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Elsevier | en_UK |
dc.relation | Ayers S, Sinesi A, Coates R, Cheyne H, Maxwell M, Best C, McNicol S, Williams LR, Uddin N, Shakespeare J & Alderdice F (2024) When is the best time to screen for perinatal anxiety? A longitudinal cohort study. <i>Journal of Anxiety Disorders</i>, 103, Art. No.: 102841. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102841 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article. To request permission for a type of use not listed, please contact Elsevier Global Rights Department. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | Anxiety | en_UK |
dc.subject | Screening | en_UK |
dc.subject | Pregnancy | en_UK |
dc.subject | Postpartum | en_UK |
dc.subject | Assessment | en_UK |
dc.title | When is the best time to screen for perinatal anxiety? A longitudinal cohort study | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1016/j.janxdis.2024.102841 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 38367480 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Journal of Anxiety Disorders | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1873-7897 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0887-6185 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 103 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | NIHR National Institute for Health Research | en_UK |
dc.author.email | catherine.best2@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 06/02/2024 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | NMAHP | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | NMAHP | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | NMAHP | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Institute for Social Marketing | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | NMAHP | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of London | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Independent | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Oxford | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85185493024 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1976442 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-5738-8390 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0003-3318-9500 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-3652-2498 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2024-01-29 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2024-01-29 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2024-02-19 | en_UK |
dc.relation.funderproject | Methods of assessing perinatal anxiety: The acceptability, effectiveness and feasibility of different approaches | en_UK |
dc.relation.funderref | 17/105/16 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Ayers, Susan| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Sinesi, Andrea| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Coates, Rose| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Cheyne, Helen|0000-0001-5738-8390 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Maxwell, Margaret|0000-0003-3318-9500 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Best, Cath|0000-0002-3652-2498 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | McNicol, Stacey| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Williams, Louise R| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Uddin, Nazihah| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Shakespeare, Judy| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Alderdice, Fiona| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | 17/105/16|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2024-02-29 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2024-02-29| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | 1-s2.0-S0887618524000173-main.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1873-7897 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
1-s2.0-S0887618524000173-main.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 1.29 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.