Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35942
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorRazai, Mohammad Sen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMansour, Raniaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRavindran, Pahalavien_UK
dc.contributor.authorFreeman, Samuelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMason-Apps, Charlotteen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMorris, Joanen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMajeed, Azeemen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHargreaves, Sallyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorUssher, Michaelen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOakeshott, Pippaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2024-04-24T00:01:55Z-
dc.date.available2024-04-24T00:01:55Z-
dc.date.issued2024-04-19en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35942-
dc.description.abstractIntroduction Vaccination during pregnancy protects both the mother and the foetus from vaccine-preventable diseases. However, uptake of the recommended vaccines (influenza, pertussis, COVID-19) by pregnant women remains low in Europe and the USA. Understanding the reasons for this is crucial to inform strategies to increase vaccination rates in pregnant women. This qualitative systematic review aimed to identify the barriers and facilitators to vaccination against influenza, pertussis/whooping cough and COVID-19 during pregnancy and identify possible strategies to increase vaccination rates. Methods We conducted a comprehensive search of electronic databases, including Medline, PsycINFO, CINAHL, Web of Science, WHO database, Embase and grey literature to identify qualitative studies that explored barriers and facilitators to vaccine uptake among pregnant women (PROSPERO CRD42023399488). The search was limited to studies published between 2012 and 2022 conducted in high-income countries with established vaccination programmes during pregnancy. Studies were thematically analysed and underwent quality assessment using the Joanna Briggs Institute validated critical appraisal tool for qualitative research. Results Out of 2681 articles screened, 28 studies (n = 1573 participants) were eligible for inclusion. Five overarching themes emerged relating to personal, provider and systemic factors. Barriers to vaccine uptake included concerns about vaccine safety and efficacy, lack of knowledge about vaccines’ benefits and necessity, fear of adverse effects on the foetus or mother and low perception of disease severity. Facilitators included recommendations from trusted healthcare providers, easy access to vaccination, clear communication on the benefits and safety of vaccination, and positive social influences from family and friends. Strategies for increasing vaccination uptake included strong and proactive vaccine recommendations by trusted healthcare professionals, provision of vaccines during routine antenatal care, and clear and consistent communication about vaccines addressing pregnant women’s concerns. Conclusion This review highlights the need for interventions that address the identified barriers to vaccine uptake among pregnant women. Recommendation from a healthcare provider can play a significant role in promoting vaccine uptake, as can clear risk/benefit communication and convenient access to vaccination. Addressing concerns about vaccine safety and providing accurate information about vaccines is also important.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherPublic Library of Scienceen_UK
dc.relationRazai MS, Mansour R, Ravindran P, Freeman S, Mason-Apps C, Morris J, Majeed A, Hargreaves S, Ussher M & Oakeshott P (2024) Facilitators and Barriers to Vaccination Uptake in Pregnancy: A Qualitative Systematic Review. <i>PLoS ONE</i>. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0298407en_UK
dc.rightsCopyright: © 2024 Razai et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleFacilitators and Barriers to Vaccination Uptake in Pregnancy: A Qualitative Systematic Reviewen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1371/journal.pone.0298407en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid38640190en_UK
dc.citation.jtitlePLoS ONEen_UK
dc.citation.issn1932-6203en_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.author.emailmichael.ussher@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date19/04/2024en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity Hospitals of Leicester NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBrighton And Sussex University Hospitals NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationImperial College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute for Social Marketingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSt George's, University of Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1988000en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
dc.date.accepted2024-01-25en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-01-25en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2024-03-06en_UK
dc.subject.tagCOVID-19en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorRazai, Mohammad S|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMansour, Rania|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRavindran, Pahalavi|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFreeman, Samuel|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMason-Apps, Charlotte|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMorris, Joan|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMajeed, Azeem|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHargreaves, Sally|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorUssher, Michael|0000-0002-0995-7955en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOakeshott, Pippa|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2024-04-22en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2024-04-22|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamejournal.pone.0298407.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1932-6203en_UK
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
journal.pone.0298407.pdfFulltext - Published Version832.41 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.