Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35982
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorYu, Hong-Linen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOkoli, Pontianen_UK
dc.contributor.editorFarah, Yousephen_UK
dc.contributor.editorBergamini, Elisabettaen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-03T00:10:27Z-
dc.date.available2024-05-03T00:10:27Z-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/35982-
dc.description.abstractFirst paragraph: The focus on litigation and arbitration as the main traditional and dominant forms of resolving international commercial disputesis gradually turning with an increase of multi-tier dispute resolution clauses in international commercial transactions. Mediation is now on track to gradually gain prominence, especially as a global framework for enforcing mediated settlement rules “is not just visionary, but a necessary tool for encouraging mediation”. This development is underscored by the United Nations Convention on International Settlements Agreements Resulting from Mediation of 2018 (“the Convention”). The Convention defines mediation as “a process, irrespective of the expression used or the basis upon which the process is carried out, whereby parties attempt to reach an amicable settlement of their dispute with the assistance of a third person or persons (“the mediator”) lacking the authority to impose a solution upon the parties to the dispute”. Aiming to deliver a harmonised legal framework for the fair and efficient settlement of disputes arising in international commercial relations, the Convention was introduced to ensure the enforceability of cross-border settlement agreements on international commercial disputes. The 2018 United Nations General Assembly Resolution also emphasised the need for “the adoption of a convention … that is acceptable to States with different legal, social and economic systems.” The Convention complements the existing legal framework on international mediation and contributes to the development of harmonious international economic relations. It also aims to develop “consistent standards on the cross-border enforcement of international settlement agreements resulting from mediation.” The ideology underpinning the Convention is that, subject to Article 1(3)(a) of the Convention, all international commercial mediation settlement agreements reached between parties should be enforced by signatory parties to the Convention.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherEdward Elgaren_UK
dc.relationYu H & Okoli P (2024) The Prospects of Enforcing Settlement Agreements under the Singapore Convention on Mediation – A Comparative Study of Nigeria and China. In: Farah Y & Bergamini E (eds.) <i>Research Handbook on EU Private International Law</i>. 2nd ed. Research Handbooks in European Law series. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.en_UK
dc.relation.ispartofseriesResearch Handbooks in European Law seriesen_UK
dc.rightsThis item has been embargoed for a period. During the embargo please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study. This is a draft chapter. The final version will be available in Research Handbook on EU Private International Law, 2nd edn. edited by Youseph Farah and Elisabetta Bergamini, forthcoming 2024, Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd. The material cannot be used for any other purpose without further permission of the publisher, and is for private use only.en_UK
dc.titleThe Prospects of Enforcing Settlement Agreements under the Singapore Convention on Mediation – A Comparative Study of Nigeria and Chinaen_UK
dc.typePart of book or chapter of booken_UK
dc.rights.embargodate2026-10-04en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[Singapore Convention 2024-04-04 Final version (1).pdf] Publisher requires embargo of 6 months after publication.en_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailh.l.yu@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.btitleResearch Handbook on EU Private International Lawen_UK
dc.publisher.addressCheltenhamen_UK
dc.description.notesOutput Status: Forthcomingen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLawen_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1996576en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2704-4161en_UK
dc.date.accepted2024-04-04en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2024-04-04en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2024-04-04en_UK
rioxxterms.typeBook chapteren_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorYu, Hong-Lin|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOkoli, Pontian|0000-0003-2704-4161en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.contributorFarah, Youseph|en_UK
local.rioxx.contributorBergamini, Elisabetta|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2026-10-04en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||2026-10-03en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2026-10-04|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameSingapore Convention 2024-04-04 Final version (1).pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Book Chapters and Sections

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Singapore Convention 2024-04-04 Final version (1).pdfFulltext - Accepted Version834.72 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2026-10-04    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.