Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36029
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorMcGregor, Lesley-
dc.contributor.advisorSwanson, Vivien-
dc.contributor.authorWeir, Corina-
dc.date.accessioned2024-05-31T10:22:01Z-
dc.date.issued2023-10-31-
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/36029-
dc.description.abstractBackground: The study of human behaviour is dominated by work published on Western, Educated, Industrialised, Rich, and Democratic (WEIRD) populations. Not only do samples in psychological studies need diversifying, but the research methods and tools used to assess human behaviour require further consideration for non-WEIRD populations. There is a demand to prioritise research efforts in sub-Saharan African (SSA) countries and ensure that research methods are culturally relevant. Methods: Mixed methods were used to assess what researchers should consider when developing behavioral science measures to explore self-report measures in SSA countries. A qualitative study explored behavioural science researchers’ experiences of the methodological challenges of using self-report questionnaires in SSA countries. A systematic review considered what self-report measurement tools have been used to assess the behavioural influences on antimicrobial use for healthcare workers working in SSA countries, as an example area to explore potential problems with measurements. A secondary data analysis study was also conducted to assess whether response category descriptors of Likert scales were perceived differently by individuals in the UK and individuals in SSA countries. Results: This thesis highlights key challenges which are particularly pertinent for researchers working in SSA countries, including differing interpretations of psychological constructs; complexities with adaptation and translation of question items and Likert response scales; and under reporting of pilot testing, validity, and reliability assessments. Conclusions: Being aware of the potential limitations with quantitative self-report measures, reflecting on alternative methods for collecting data and ensuring adequate adaptation of measurement tools is crucial to developing questionnaires which are relevant in SSA countries. This may involve investing in research development practices to understand psychological constructs from the viewpoint of individuals in SSA countries, setting aside Western preconceptions on psychological constructs and how they should be measured.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.subjectbehavioural scienceen_GB
dc.subjectself-reporten_GB
dc.subjectLikert scalesen_GB
dc.subjectglobal healthen_GB
dc.subjectLMICsen_GB
dc.titleExploring the use of self-report behavioural science questionnaires in sub-Saharan African countriesen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.rights.embargodate2025-05-30-
dc.rights.embargoreasonI would like to request a delay of 12 months for access to my thesis to allow time to write up articles and submit for publication.en_GB
dc.author.emailcorinaweir@gmail.comen_GB
dc.rights.embargoterms2025-05-31en_GB
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2025-05-31-
Appears in Collections:Psychology eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Top Up Thesis Student ID 1618173.pdf1.25 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2025-05-31    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.