Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36570
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.advisorHancock, Peter J B-
dc.contributor.advisorBobak, Anna K-
dc.contributor.authorLowes, Judith-
dc.date.accessioned2025-01-24T08:02:19Z-
dc.date.issued2024-08-09-
dc.identifier.citationLowes, J., Hancock, P. J. B., & Bobak, A. K. (2024). Evidence for different visual processing strategy for non-face stimuli in developmental prosopagnosia. Visual Cognition, 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2024.2359743en_GB
dc.identifier.citationLowes, J., Hancock, P. J. B., & Bobak, A. K. (2024). Evidence for different visual processing strategy for non-face stimuli in developmental prosopagnosia. Visual Cognition, 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2024.2359743en_GB
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/36570-
dc.description.abstractIn this thesis, I investigated objective and subjective experiences of developmental prosopagnosia (DP), a neurodevelopmental condition that results in severe face recognition difficulties. To assess objective face processing, I first screened for general cognitive deficits that could explain poor face test performance. Participants completed a fluid reasoning task using abstract shapes. Potential DPs were more accurate than controls but significantly slower, suggesting speed-accuracy trade-off in non-face tasks. To address this, I calculated the Balanced Integration Score (BIS). Results showed no group differences, highlighting that DPs clearly adopted a different strategy from controls. I next investigated which face memory measures best classified DP. Participants completed two face memory tests, the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) and Old New Faces, a bicycle memory task and a famous faces recognition test. I directly compared how well accuracy and (BIS) classified DP. BIS was a more sensitive measure than accuracy alone on these tasks, classifying 83% vs 58% of DPs respectively and produced larger group effect sizes. I next systematically tested which subprocesses of face perception were impaired in DP. Single case analysis, group comparisons and intraclass correlations showed that face perception ability was highly heterogenous. Data showed evidence for two sub types of DP; an apperceptive subtype, in which both face perception and face memory are impaired and a mnemonic subtype (in which only face memory is impaired). Finally, I explored subjective experiences of living with DP using a mixed methods survey. Responses provided further evidence of the heterogeneity of the condition and highlighted the types of difficulties that DPs experienced in everyday life and their priorities for future research. Being unable to recognise close friends and family was a common experience and lower CFMT scores were not associated with the ability to recognise friends and family.en_GB
dc.language.isoenen_GB
dc.publisherUniversity of Stirlingen_GB
dc.rightsFigure 2.1 reproduced with permission from Bruce and Young (1986) showing the functional model. The structural encoding stage is involved in face perception, the later stages are involved in recognition;Figure 2.5 reprinted with permission from Robotham and Starrfelt (2018) from Elsevier from Neuropsychologia (121), Robotham and Starrfelt, Tests of whole upright face processing in prosopagnosia: A literature review, Pages 106-121, Copyright (2018); Figure 3.2 Figure reproduced with permission; Figure 2.2 Figure reproduced from Burton et al. (1990) Used with permission of John Wiley & Sons from [Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model, Burton, Bruce, and Johnston, 81: 361-380, (1990) permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc; Figure 2.3 Figure reproduced with permission from Neuropsychologia (45) pages 32-41, Gobbini and Haxby (2007) © Elsevier; Figure 2.4 used with permission of Annual Reviews from The Annual Review of Vision Science (1: 393-416), Duchaine and Yovel (2015).en_GB
dc.subjectDevelopmental prosopagnosiaen_GB
dc.subjectface processingen_GB
dc.subjectspeed-accuracy trade offen_GB
dc.subjectface recognitionen_GB
dc.subjectface perceptionen_GB
dc.subjectbalanced integration scoreen_GB
dc.subjectface recognition impairmenten_GB
dc.subject.lcshProsopagnosiaen_GB
dc.subject.lcshFace perceptionen_GB
dc.titleObjective and subjective experiences of developmental prosopagnosiaen_GB
dc.typeThesis or Dissertationen_GB
dc.relation.referencesFigure 2.1 from, Bruce & Young, Understanding face recognition, British Journal of Psychology (1986), 77, 305-327 © 1986 The British Psychological Societyen_GB
dc.relation.referencesFigure 2.5 from Robotham and Starrfelt, Tests of whole upright face processing in prosopagnosia: A literature review, Neuropsychologia 121, Pages 106-121, Copyright (2018)en_GB
dc.relation.referencesFigure 3.2 reproduced with permission from Chierchia, G., Fuhrmann, D., Knoll, L. J., Pi-Sunyer, B. P., Sakhardande, A. L., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2019). The Matrix Reasoning Item Bank (MaRs-IB): Novel, open-access abstract reasoning items for adolescents and adults. Royal Society Open Science, 6(10), 190232. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190232en_GB
dc.relation.referencesFigure 2.2 from Burton, Bruce, and Johnston Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model, British Journal of Psychology, 81: 361-380, (1990)en_GB
dc.relation.referencesFigure 2.3 from Gobbini, M. I., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.015en_GB
dc.relation.referencesFigure 2.4 from Duchaine, B., & Yovel, G. (2015). A Revised Neural Framework for Face Processing. Annual Review of Vision Science, 1(1), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035518en_GB
dc.type.qualificationlevelDoctoralen_GB
dc.type.qualificationnameDoctor of Philosophyen_GB
dc.rights.embargodate2026-01-22-
dc.rights.embargoreasonFor publicationen_GB
dc.contributor.funderESRC/Scottish Graduate School of Social Sciences Grant number ES/P000681/1 to Judith Lowes and a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship (grant number ECF-2019-416) to Anna K. Bobak.en_GB
dc.author.emailjudith.lowes@hotmail.co.uken_GB
dc.rights.embargoterms2026-01-23en_GB
dc.rights.embargoliftdate2026-01-23-
Appears in Collections:Psychology eTheses

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Judith Lowes Corrected Thesis 201124-repository copy.pdf4.83 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2026-01-23    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.