Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36570
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.advisor | Hancock, Peter J B | - |
dc.contributor.advisor | Bobak, Anna K | - |
dc.contributor.author | Lowes, Judith | - |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-01-24T08:02:19Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2024-08-09 | - |
dc.identifier.citation | Lowes, J., Hancock, P. J. B., & Bobak, A. K. (2024). Evidence for different visual processing strategy for non-face stimuli in developmental prosopagnosia. Visual Cognition, 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2024.2359743 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.citation | Lowes, J., Hancock, P. J. B., & Bobak, A. K. (2024). Evidence for different visual processing strategy for non-face stimuli in developmental prosopagnosia. Visual Cognition, 1–12.https://doi.org/10.1080/13506285.2024.2359743 | en_GB |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36570 | - |
dc.description.abstract | In this thesis, I investigated objective and subjective experiences of developmental prosopagnosia (DP), a neurodevelopmental condition that results in severe face recognition difficulties. To assess objective face processing, I first screened for general cognitive deficits that could explain poor face test performance. Participants completed a fluid reasoning task using abstract shapes. Potential DPs were more accurate than controls but significantly slower, suggesting speed-accuracy trade-off in non-face tasks. To address this, I calculated the Balanced Integration Score (BIS). Results showed no group differences, highlighting that DPs clearly adopted a different strategy from controls. I next investigated which face memory measures best classified DP. Participants completed two face memory tests, the Cambridge Face Memory Test (CFMT) and Old New Faces, a bicycle memory task and a famous faces recognition test. I directly compared how well accuracy and (BIS) classified DP. BIS was a more sensitive measure than accuracy alone on these tasks, classifying 83% vs 58% of DPs respectively and produced larger group effect sizes. I next systematically tested which subprocesses of face perception were impaired in DP. Single case analysis, group comparisons and intraclass correlations showed that face perception ability was highly heterogenous. Data showed evidence for two sub types of DP; an apperceptive subtype, in which both face perception and face memory are impaired and a mnemonic subtype (in which only face memory is impaired). Finally, I explored subjective experiences of living with DP using a mixed methods survey. Responses provided further evidence of the heterogeneity of the condition and highlighted the types of difficulties that DPs experienced in everyday life and their priorities for future research. Being unable to recognise close friends and family was a common experience and lower CFMT scores were not associated with the ability to recognise friends and family. | en_GB |
dc.language.iso | en | en_GB |
dc.publisher | University of Stirling | en_GB |
dc.rights | Figure 2.1 reproduced with permission from Bruce and Young (1986) showing the functional model. The structural encoding stage is involved in face perception, the later stages are involved in recognition;Figure 2.5 reprinted with permission from Robotham and Starrfelt (2018) from Elsevier from Neuropsychologia (121), Robotham and Starrfelt, Tests of whole upright face processing in prosopagnosia: A literature review, Pages 106-121, Copyright (2018); Figure 3.2 Figure reproduced with permission; Figure 2.2 Figure reproduced from Burton et al. (1990) Used with permission of John Wiley & Sons from [Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model, Burton, Bruce, and Johnston, 81: 361-380, (1990) permission conveyed through Copyright Clearance Center, Inc; Figure 2.3 Figure reproduced with permission from Neuropsychologia (45) pages 32-41, Gobbini and Haxby (2007) © Elsevier; Figure 2.4 used with permission of Annual Reviews from The Annual Review of Vision Science (1: 393-416), Duchaine and Yovel (2015). | en_GB |
dc.subject | Developmental prosopagnosia | en_GB |
dc.subject | face processing | en_GB |
dc.subject | speed-accuracy trade off | en_GB |
dc.subject | face recognition | en_GB |
dc.subject | face perception | en_GB |
dc.subject | balanced integration score | en_GB |
dc.subject | face recognition impairment | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Prosopagnosia | en_GB |
dc.subject.lcsh | Face perception | en_GB |
dc.title | Objective and subjective experiences of developmental prosopagnosia | en_GB |
dc.type | Thesis or Dissertation | en_GB |
dc.relation.references | Figure 2.1 from, Bruce & Young, Understanding face recognition, British Journal of Psychology (1986), 77, 305-327 © 1986 The British Psychological Society | en_GB |
dc.relation.references | Figure 2.5 from Robotham and Starrfelt, Tests of whole upright face processing in prosopagnosia: A literature review, Neuropsychologia 121, Pages 106-121, Copyright (2018) | en_GB |
dc.relation.references | Figure 3.2 reproduced with permission from Chierchia, G., Fuhrmann, D., Knoll, L. J., Pi-Sunyer, B. P., Sakhardande, A. L., & Blakemore, S.-J. (2019). The Matrix Reasoning Item Bank (MaRs-IB): Novel, open-access abstract reasoning items for adolescents and adults. Royal Society Open Science, 6(10), 190232. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.190232 | en_GB |
dc.relation.references | Figure 2.2 from Burton, Bruce, and Johnston Understanding face recognition with an interactive activation model, British Journal of Psychology, 81: 361-380, (1990) | en_GB |
dc.relation.references | Figure 2.3 from Gobbini, M. I., & Haxby, J. V. (2007). Neural systems for recognition of familiar faces. Neuropsychologia, 45(1), 32–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2006.04.015 | en_GB |
dc.relation.references | Figure 2.4 from Duchaine, B., & Yovel, G. (2015). A Revised Neural Framework for Face Processing. Annual Review of Vision Science, 1(1), 393–416. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-vision-082114-035518 | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationlevel | Doctoral | en_GB |
dc.type.qualificationname | Doctor of Philosophy | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargodate | 2026-01-22 | - |
dc.rights.embargoreason | For publication | en_GB |
dc.contributor.funder | ESRC/Scottish Graduate School of Social Sciences Grant number ES/P000681/1 to Judith Lowes and a Leverhulme Trust Early Career Fellowship (grant number ECF-2019-416) to Anna K. Bobak. | en_GB |
dc.author.email | judith.lowes@hotmail.co.uk | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoterms | 2026-01-23 | en_GB |
dc.rights.embargoliftdate | 2026-01-23 | - |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology eTheses |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Judith Lowes Corrected Thesis 201124-repository copy.pdf | 4.83 MB | Adobe PDF | Under Embargo until 2026-01-23 Request a copy |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.