Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36608
Appears in Collections: | Law and Philosophy Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Resolving Peer Disagreement about the Law |
Author(s): | Houghton, Alexander |
Contact Email: | alexander.houghton@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | Jurisprudence Philosophy of Law Legal Theory Epistemology Social Epistemology Peer Disagreement Legal Epistemology Interpretation Legal Knowledge |
Issue Date: | Sep-2024 |
Date Deposited: | 16-Dec-2024 |
Citation: | Houghton A (2024) Resolving Peer Disagreement about the Law. <i>Legal Theory</i>, 30 (3), pp. 142-169. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1352325224000156 |
Abstract: | Legal experts—lawyers, judges, and academics—typically resist changing their beliefs about what the law is or requires when they encounter disagreement from those committed to different jurisprudential or interpretive theories. William Baude and Ryan Doerfler are among the most prominent proponents of this view, holding it because fundamental differences in methodological commitments severs epistemic peerhood. This dominant approach to disagreement, and Baude and Doerfler’s rationale, are both wrong. The latter is committed to an overly stringent account of epistemic peerhood that dogmatically excludes opponents. The former violates the conjunction of three plausible epistemic principles: Complete Evidence, considering all epistemically permissible evidence; Independence, in which only dispute-independent evidence is epistemically permissible; and Peer Support, which involves epistemically permissible evidence. Instead, I argue for jurisprudential humility—we ought to be more willing to admit we do not know what the law is or requires, and take seriously conflicting views. |
DOI Link: | 10.1017/S1352325224000156 |
Rights: | © The Author(s), 2025. Published by Cambridge University Press This is an Open Access article, distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0), which permits unrestricted re-use, distribution and reproduction, provided the original article is properly cited |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
resolving-peer-disagreement-about-the-law.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 354.42 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.