Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36697
Appears in Collections: | Computing Science and Mathematics Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Refereed |
Title: | Machine Learning–Based Approach for Identifying Research Gaps: COVID-19 as a Case Study |
Author(s): | Abd-alrazaq, Alaa Nashwan, Abdulqadir J Shah, Zubair Abujaber, Ahmad Alhuwail, Dari Schneider, Jens AlSaad, Rawan Ali, Hazrat Alomoush, Waleed Ahmed, Arfan Aziz, Sarah |
Contact Email: | ali.hazrat@stir.ac.uk |
Keywords: | research gaps research gap research topic research topics scientific literature literature review machine learning COVID-19 BERTopic topic clustering text analysis BERT NLP natural language processing review methods review methodology SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus COVID |
Issue Date: | 5-Mar-2024 |
Date Deposited: | 13-Dec-2024 |
Citation: | Abd-alrazaq A, Nashwan AJ, Shah Z, Abujaber A, Alhuwail D, Schneider J, AlSaad R, Ali H, Alomoush W, Ahmed A & Aziz S (2024) Machine Learning–Based Approach for Identifying Research Gaps: COVID-19 as a Case Study. <i>JMIR Formative Research</i>, 8, Art. No.: e49411. https://doi.org/10.2196/49411 |
Abstract: | Background: Research gaps refer to unanswered questions in the existing body of knowledge, either due to a lack of studies or inconclusive results. Research gaps are essential starting points and motivation in scientific research. Traditional methods for identifying research gaps, such as literature reviews and expert opinions, can be time consuming, labor intensive, and prone to bias. They may also fall short when dealing with rapidly evolving or time-sensitive subjects. Thus, innovative scalable approaches are needed to identify research gaps, systematically assess the literature, and prioritize areas for further study in the topic of interest. Objective: In this paper, we propose a machine learning–based approach for identifying research gaps through the analysis of scientific literature. We used the COVID-19 pandemic as a case study. Methods: We conducted an analysis to identify research gaps in COVID-19 literature using the COVID-19 Open Research (CORD-19) data set, which comprises 1,121,433 papers related to the COVID-19 pandemic. Our approach is based on the BERTopic topic modeling technique, which leverages transformers and class-based term frequency-inverse document frequency to create dense clusters allowing for easily interpretable topics. Our BERTopic-based approach involves 3 stages: embedding documents, clustering documents (dimension reduction and clustering), and representing topics (generating candidates and maximizing candidate relevance). Results: After applying the study selection criteria, we included 33,206 abstracts in the analysis of this study. The final list of research gaps identified 21 different areas, which were grouped into 6 principal topics. These topics were: “virus of COVID-19,” “risk factors of COVID-19,” “prevention of COVID-19,” “treatment of COVID-19,” “health care delivery during COVID-19,” “and impact of COVID-19.” The most prominent topic, observed in over half of the analyzed studies, was “the impact of COVID-19.” Conclusions: The proposed machine learning–based approach has the potential to identify research gaps in scientific literature. This study is not intended to replace individual literature research within a selected topic. Instead, it can serve as a guide to formulate precise literature search queries in specific areas associated with research questions that previous publications have earmarked for future exploration. Future research should leverage an up-to-date list of studies that are retrieved from the most common databases in the target area. When feasible, full texts or, at minimum, discussion sections should be analyzed rather than limiting their analysis to abstracts. Furthermore, future studies could evaluate more efficient modeling algorithms, especially those combining topic modeling with statistical uncertainty quantification, such as conformal prediction. |
DOI Link: | 10.2196/49411 |
Rights: | This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Formative Research, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on https://formative.jmir.org, as well as this copyright and license information must be included. |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
formative-2024-1-e49411.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 215.83 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.