Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/7525
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSaunders, Benen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2012-08-23T09:02:50Z-
dc.date.available2012-08-23T09:02:50Z-
dc.date.issued2010-10en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/7525-
dc.description.abstractDemocracy is commonly associated with political equality and/or majority rule. This essay shows that these three ideas are conceptually separate, so the transition from any one to another stands in need of further substantive argument, which is not always adequately given. It does this by offering an alternative decision-making mechanism, called lottery voting, in which all individuals cast votes for their preferred options but, instead of these being counted, one is randomly selected and that vote determines the outcome. This procedure is democratic and egalitarian, since all have an equal chance to influence outcomes, but obviously not majoritarian.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherThe University of Chicago Pressen_UK
dc.relationSaunders B (2010) Democracy, Political Equality, and Majority Rule. Ethics, 121 (1), pp. 148-177. http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656474; https://doi.org/10.1086/656474en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Ethics by The University of Chicago Press. The original publication is available at: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656474en_UK
dc.titleDemocracy, Political Equality, and Majority Ruleen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1086/656474en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleEthicsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1539-297Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn0014-1704en_UK
dc.citation.volume121en_UK
dc.citation.issue1en_UK
dc.citation.spage148en_UK
dc.citation.epage177en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.identifier.urlhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/656474en_UK
dc.author.emailben.saunders@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPhilosophyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000284940600007en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid784048en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2010-10-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-08-22en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSaunders, Ben|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2012-08-22en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2012-08-22|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename656474.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0014-1704en_UK
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
656474.pdfFulltext - Published Version159.14 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.