Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/1162
Appears in Collections:Law and Philosophy Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Defending the Wide-Scope Approach to Instrumental Reason
Author(s): Way, Jonathan
Contact Email: j.m.way@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Instrumental reason
Wide-scope
Object-given and state-given reasons
Broome
Setiya
Kolodny
Reasons
Rationality
Reason
Objectivity
Practical reason
Issue Date: Jan-2010
Date Deposited: 11-May-2009
Citation: Way J (2010) Defending the Wide-Scope Approach to Instrumental Reason. Philosophical Studies, 147 (2), pp. 213-233. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11098-008-9277-2
Abstract: The Wide-Scope approach to instrumental reason holds that the requirement to intend the necessary means to your ends should be understood as a requirement to either intend the means, or else not intend the end. In this paper I explain and defend a neglected version of this approach. I argue that three serious objections to Wide-Scope accounts turn on a certain assumption about the nature of the reasons that ground the Wide-Scope requirement. The version of the Wide-Scope approach defended here allows us to reject this assumption, and so defuse the objections.
DOI Link: 10.1007/s11098-008-9277-2
Rights: Published in Philosophical Studies by Springer. The original publication is available at www.springerlink.com

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Defending.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version107.03 kBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.