Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23361
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Chambers, Julie | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | O'Carroll, Ronan | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Brownlee, Linda | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Libby, Gillian | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Steele, Robert | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2016-12-07T22:19:05Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2016-12-07T22:19:05Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2016-02-05 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.other | 13 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23361 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Background: Colorectal cancer is a major cause of cancer deaths worldwide. Screening is key to early detection but uptake of national programmes is poor, especially amongst those from lower socio-economic backgrounds. Decisions not to take up screening may be based more on emotional rather than rational evaluations. We aimed to examine the importance of perceived disgust (the ‘ICK’ factor) in determining colorectal cancer screening uptake, in a large, randomised controlled trial. Methods: This paper reports secondary analysis of a randomised controlled trial of a simple, questionnaire-based Anticipated Regret (AR) intervention, which was delivered alongside existing pre-notification letters. 60,000 adults aged 50- 74 who were participant in the Scottish National Screening programme were randomised to one of 3 treatment arms: 1) no questionnaire (control), 2) Health Locus of Control (HLOC) questionnaire or 3) AR questionnaire. Primary outcome was Faecal Occult Blood Test kit return (FOBT uptake). 13,645 people completed questionnaires of secondary outcomes including intention to return test kit and a new self-report measure of perceived disgust (ICK-C). Results: Intentions, ICK and AR were all predictors of FOBT uptake; however, for people who expressed strong intentions to return their FOBT kit, only ICK differentiated kit returners from non-returners, with non-returners reporting higher disgust (mean difference=0.51; 95% CI for difference (0.37, 0.64), Cohen’s d=0.34). The 4-item ICK-C showed excellent internal reliability and predictive validity with regard to an objective measure i.e., FOBT uptake. Conclusions: The findings show that perceived disgust is an important emotional psychological construct in determining uptake of colorectal cancer screening. We also demonstrated that a simple 4-item scale (the ‘ICK-C), developed to be used in research on colorectal cancer screening, has excellent psychometric properties. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | iMedPub | en_UK |
dc.relation | Chambers J, O'Carroll R, Brownlee L, Libby G & Steele R (2016) Colorectal cancer screening and perceived disgust: the importance of the “ICK” factor in Faecal Occult Blood Test uptake. Colorectal Cancer: Open Access, 2 (1), Art. No.: 13. http://colorectal-cancer.imedpub.com/archive.php | en_UK |
dc.rights | Published under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | Colorectal cancer | en_UK |
dc.subject | Screening | en_UK |
dc.subject | Faecal occult blood test | en_UK |
dc.subject | Disgust the ‘ICK’ factor | en_UK |
dc.title | Colorectal cancer screening and perceived disgust: the importance of the “ICK” factor in Faecal Occult Blood Test uptake | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Colorectal Cancer: Open Access | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | No ISSN | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 2 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 1 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.identifier.url | http://colorectal-cancer.imedpub.com/archive.php | en_UK |
dc.author.email | ronan.ocarroll@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 05/02/2016 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Scottish Bowel Screening Centre | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Dundee | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Dundee | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 578740 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-5130-291X | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2016-02-01 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2016-02-01 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2016-06-22 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not charged | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Chambers, Julie| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | O'Carroll, Ronan|0000-0002-5130-291X | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Brownlee, Linda| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Libby, Gillian| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Steele, Robert| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Internal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2016-06-22 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2016-06-22| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Colorect Cancer 2016 Chambers.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | No ISSN | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Colorect Cancer 2016 Chambers.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 321.22 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.