Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/23791
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorNoel, Melanieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBoerner, Katelynn Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorBirnie, Kathryn Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCaes, Lineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorParker, Jennifer Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChambers, Christine Ten_UK
dc.contributor.authorFernandez, Conrad Ven_UK
dc.contributor.authorLee, Kangen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2016-12-17T22:30:28Z-
dc.date.available2016-12-17T22:30:28Z-
dc.date.issued2015-02en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/23791-
dc.description.abstractOBJECTIVE: Deception has been used to investigate the role of developmental and behavioral factors in child health; however, its acceptability for use in pediatric research has received little empirical attention. This study examined the acceptability of deception in a pediatric pain research study as assessed through participating children's and parent's long-term perceptions of its use.  METHOD: Ninety-four children (52 boys; meanage = 12.77 yr) and their parents (86 mothers, 8 fathers) completed a structured interview that assessed perceptions of various aspects of deception in a pediatric pain study, 2.5 years after participating.  RESULTS: A minority of parents (25.5%) and children (13.8%) spontaneously recalled that deception was used. Overall, parents and children reported positive experiences with research participation, felt comfortable with the debriefing process, and deemed the research to be of societal importance. Opinions about researchers and psychologists were not negatively impacted, and most reported willingness to participate in research involving deception again.  CONCLUSION: When thoughtfully planned and disclosed, deception in pediatric research seems to be acceptable to parents and children. Future research should further examine the acceptability of deception and alternatives (e.g., authorized deception) among pediatric samples.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWolters Kluwer Healthen_UK
dc.relationNoel M, Boerner KE, Birnie KA, Caes L, Parker JA, Chambers CT, Fernandez CV & Lee K (2015) Acceptability by parents and children of deception in pediatric research. Journal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatrics, 36 (2), pp. 75-85. https://doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000122en_UK
dc.rightsPublisher policy allows this work to be made available in this repository. Published in Journal of Developmental & Behavioral Pediatrics: February/March 2015 - Volume 36 - Issue 2 - p 75–85 by Wolters Kluwer. The original publication is available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/DBP.0000000000000122en_UK
dc.titleAcceptability by parents and children of deception in pediatric researchen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1097/DBP.0000000000000122en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid25650951en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Developmental and Behavioral Pediatricsen_UK
dc.citation.issn1536-7312en_UK
dc.citation.issn0196-206Xen_UK
dc.citation.volume36en_UK
dc.citation.issue2en_UK
dc.citation.spage75en_UK
dc.citation.epage85en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.author.emailline.caes@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationSeattle Children’sen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDalhousie Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDalhousie Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCentre for Pediatric Pain Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDalhousie Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationDalhousie Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Torontoen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84923205216en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid559266en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-02-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2016-07-13en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorNoel, Melanie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBoerner, Katelynn E|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBirnie, Kathryn A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCaes, Line|0000-0001-7355-0706en_UK
local.rioxx.authorParker, Jennifer A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChambers, Christine T|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFernandez, Conrad V|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLee, Kang|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2016-07-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/all-rights-reserved|2016-07-14|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameNoel Birnie et al. 2014.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0196-206Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Noel Birnie et al. 2014.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version147.29 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.