Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/24881
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorSwanson, Vivienen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPower, Kevin Georgeen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2017-01-31T22:34:11Z-
dc.date.available2017-01-31T22:34:11Zen_UK
dc.date.issued2005-05en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/24881-
dc.description.abstractAims. This paper reports a study investigating new mothers' subjective norms in relation to both breast- and bottle-feeding. The influence of norms on women's infant feeding decisions and the relative influence of social referents at varying degrees of social distance were assessed.Background. Increasing breastfeeding initiation and continuation rates is a key challenge for health educators. The perceived influence of other people's views (subjective norms), including the views of women's partners and health care professionals, is an important predictor of infant feeding behaviour.Methods. Semi-structured questionnaires were administered to 203 new mothers in central and northern Scotland and followed-up by postal questionnaire at 6weeks. Infant feeding intentions, feeding behaviour at birth and follow-up, behavioural beliefs and subjective norms for both breastfeeding and bottle-feeding were assessed. The data were collected in 1998-1999.Results. Subjective norms were important determinants of initiation and continuation of breastfeeding for breast- and bottlefeeders. Breastfeeders rated close social referents as more in favour of bottle-feeding and more against breastfeeding at follow-up, whereas bottlefeeders' ratings did not change. Partner's and nurses'/midwives' views were an important influence at baseline and follow-up. Breastfeeding ‘continuers' perceived their partners as more pro-breastfeeding at 6weeks. Discontinuers perceived more overall social pressure to bottle-feed. However, sampling limitations may have led to over-representation of the views of breastfeeders at baseline and follow-up.Conclusions. Nurses and midwives have a crucial role in communicating positive views on breastfeeding to new mothers at different time points. Future interventions to promote breastfeeding could adopt a broad social approach, encouraging positive norms for existing and potential mothers and fathers, families and people in general.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherWiley-Blackwellen_UK
dc.relationSwanson V & Power KG (2005) Initiation and continuation of breastfeeding: theory of planned behaviour. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 50 (3), pp. 272-282. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03390.xen_UK
dc.rightsThe publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserveden_UK
dc.subjectsubjective normsen_UK
dc.subjectTheory of Planned Behaviouren_UK
dc.subjectmidwiferyen_UK
dc.subjectbottle-feedingen_UK
dc.subjectbreastfeedingen_UK
dc.titleInitiation and continuation of breastfeeding: theory of planned behaviouren_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.rights.embargodate3000-01-01en_UK
dc.rights.embargoreason[jan_3390.pdf] The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository therefore there is an embargo on the full text of the work.en_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03390.xen_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Advanced Nursingen_UK
dc.citation.issn1365-2648en_UK
dc.citation.issn0309-2402en_UK
dc.citation.volume50en_UK
dc.citation.issue3en_UK
dc.citation.spage272en_UK
dc.citation.epage282en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.author.emailvivien.swanson@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date31/03/2005en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationAnxiety and Stress Research Centre - LEGACYen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000228669900006en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-17444385886en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid764421en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1685-2991en_UK
dc.date.accepted2004-10-19en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2004-10-19en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2012-09-13en_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorSwanson, Vivien|0000-0002-1685-2991en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPower, Kevin George|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectInternal Project|University of Stirling|https://isni.org/isni/0000000122484331en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate3000-01-01en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved||en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamejan_3390.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0309-2402en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
jan_3390.pdfFulltext - Published Version110.66 kBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 3000-01-01    Request a copy


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.