Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29148
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Myrseth, Kristian Ove R | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Wollbrant, Conny | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2019-03-30T01:01:41Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2019-03-30T01:01:41Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2015-05 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29148 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Kieslich and Hilbig (2014) employ a mouse-tracking technique to measure decision conflict in social dilemmas. They report that defectors exhibit more conflict than do cooperators. They infer that cooperation thus is the reflexive, default behavior. We argue, however, that their analysis fails to discriminate between reflexive versus cognitively controlled behavioral responses. This is because cognitive conflict can emanate from resisting impulse successfully—or unsuccessfully. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Society for Judgment and Decision Making | en_UK |
dc.relation | Myrseth KOR & Wollbrant C (2015) Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option: Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014). Commentary on: Kieslich, P. J., & Hilbig, B. E. (2014). Cognitive conflict in social dilemmas: An analysis of response dynamics. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(6), 510–522.. Judgment and Decision Making, 10 (3), pp. 277-279. http://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.pdf | en_UK |
dc.relation.isbasedon | Kieslich, P. J., & Hilbig, B. E. (2014). Cognitive conflict in social dilemmas: An analysis of response dynamics. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(6), 510–522. | en_UK |
dc.rights | Copyright: © 2015. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | social dilemma | en_UK |
dc.subject | cooperation | en_UK |
dc.subject | intuition | en_UK |
dc.subject | cognitive conflict | en_UK |
dc.subject | self-control | en_UK |
dc.title | Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option: Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014) | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | Judgment and Decision Making | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1930-2975 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 10 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issue | 3 | en_UK |
dc.citation.spage | 277 | en_UK |
dc.citation.epage | 279 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Unrefereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | Swedish Research Council | en_UK |
dc.identifier.url | http://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.pdf | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of St Andrews | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Gothenburg | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1104445 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2015-03-01 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2015-03-01 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2019-02-02 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not charged | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Myrseth, Kristian Ove R| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Wollbrant, Conny| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|Swedish Research Council| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2019-03-27 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/|2019-03-27| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Myrseth_Wollbrant_2015_JDM.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1930-2975 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Economics Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Myrseth_Wollbrant_2015_JDM.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 64.73 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.