Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30022
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMurray, Jamie Gen_UK
dc.contributor.authorOuyang, Guangen_UK
dc.contributor.authorDonaldson, David Ien_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-08-23T09:28:54Z-
dc.date.available2019-08-23T09:28:54Z-
dc.date.issued2019-07-23en_UK
dc.identifier.other179en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30022-
dc.description.abstractAlthough the neural mechanism supporting episodic recollection has been well characterized in younger adults, exactly how recollection is supported in older adults remains unclear. The electrophysiological correlate of recollection-the parietal retrieval success effect-for example, has been shown to be sensitive to both the amount of information recollected and the accuracy of remembered information in younger adults. To date, there is mixed evidence that parietal effect also scales with the amount of information remembered in older adults whilst there is little evidence that the same mechanism is sensitive to the accuracy of recollected information. Here, we address one potential concern when investigating Event Related Potentials (ERPs) among older adults-namely, the greater potential for single-trial latency variability to smear and reduces the amplitudes of averaged ERPs. We apply a well-established algorithm for correcting single-trial latency variability, Residual Iteration Decomposition Analysis (RIDE), to investigate whether the parietal retrieval success effect among older adults is sensitive to retrieval accuracy. Our results reveal that similar to younger adults, older adult parietal retrieval success effects scale with the accuracy of recollected information-i.e., is greater in magnitude when recollected information is of high accuracy, reduced in magnitude when accuracy is low, and entirely absent when guessing. The results help clarify the functional significance of the neural mechanism supporting recollection in older adults whilst also highlighting the potential issues with interpreting average ERPs in older adult populations.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherFrontiers Media SAen_UK
dc.relationMurray JG, Ouyang G & Donaldson DI (2019) Compensation of Trial-to-Trial Latency Jitter Reveals the Parietal Retrieval Success Effect to be Both Variable and Thresholded in Older Adults. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 11, Art. No.: 179. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2019.00179en_UK
dc.rights© 2019 Murray, Ouyang and Donaldson. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY - https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectCognitive agingen_UK
dc.subjectepisodic recollectionen_UK
dc.subjectparietal ERP effecten_UK
dc.subjectretrieval accuracyen_UK
dc.subjectresidual iteration decomposition analysisen_UK
dc.titleCompensation of Trial-to-Trial Latency Jitter Reveals the Parietal Retrieval Success Effect to be Both Variable and Thresholded in Older Adultsen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.3389/fnagi.2019.00179en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid31396075en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleFrontiers in Aging Neuroscienceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1663-4365en_UK
dc.citation.volume11en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderChief Scientist Officeen_UK
dc.contributor.funderScottish Funding Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date23/07/2019en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Hong Kongen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000476970400001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85069898330en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1415779en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8036-3455en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-07-02en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-07-02en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-08-14en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMurray, Jamie G|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorOuyang, Guang|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorDonaldson, David I|0000-0002-8036-3455en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Scottish Funding Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000360en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Chief Scientist Office|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000589en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-08-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2019-08-14|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameMurray_ Ouyang _ Donaldson_ 2019.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1663-4365en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Murray_ Ouyang _ Donaldson_ 2019.pdfFulltext - Published Version2.56 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.