Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30183
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorMcGregor, Lesley Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorvon Wagner, Christianen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAtkin, Wendyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKralj-Hans, Inesen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHalloran, Stephen Pen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHandley, Grahamen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLogan, Richard Fen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRainbow, Sandraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Steveen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSnowball, Juliaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorThomas, Mary Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSmith, Samuel Gen_UK
dc.contributor.authorVart, Gemmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHowe, Rosemaryen_UK
dc.contributor.authorCounsell, Nicholasen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-09-26T00:05:59Z-
dc.date.available2019-09-26T00:05:59Z-
dc.date.issued2016en_UK
dc.identifier.other3670150en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30183-
dc.description.abstractObjective. To test the effectiveness of adding a narrative leaflet to the current information material delivered by the NHS English colorectal cancer (CRC) screening programme on reducing socioeconomic inequalities in uptake. Participants. 150,417 adults (59–74 years) routinely invited to complete the guaiac Faecal Occult Blood test (gFOBt) in March 2013. Design. A cluster randomised controlled trial (ISRCTN74121020) to compare uptake between two arms. The control arm received the standard NHS CRC screening information material (SI) and the intervention arm received the standard information plus a supplementary narrative leaflet, which had previously been shown to increase screening intentions (SI + N). Between group comparisons were made for uptake overall and across socioeconomic status (SES). Results. Uptake was 57.7% and did not differ significantly between the two trial arms (SI: 58.5%; SI + N: 56.7%; odds ratio = 0.93; 95% confidence interval: 0.81–1.06; ). There was no interaction between group and SES quintile (). Conclusions. Adding a narrative leaflet to existing information materials does not reduce the SES gradient in uptake. Despite the benefits of using a pragmatic trial design, the need to add to, rather than replace, existing information may have limited the true value of an evidence-based intervention on behaviour. We dedicate this paper in memory of Professor Jane Wardle (1950–2015)en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherHindawi Publishing Corporationen_UK
dc.relationMcGregor LM, von Wagner C, Atkin W, Kralj-Hans I, Halloran SP, Handley G, Logan RF, Rainbow S, Smith S, Snowball J, Thomas MC, Smith SG, Vart G, Howe R & Counsell N (2016) Reducing the Social Gradient in Uptake of the NHS Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Using a Narrative-Based Information Leaflet: A Cluster-Randomised Trial. Wilson C (Editor) Gastroenterology Research and Practice, 2016, Art. No.: 3670150. https://doi.org/10.1155/2016/3670150en_UK
dc.rights© 2016 Lesley M. McGregor et al. This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleReducing the Social Gradient in Uptake of the NHS Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme Using a Narrative-Based Information Leaflet: A Cluster-Randomised Trialen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1155/2016/3670150en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid27069473en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleGastroenterology Research and Practiceen_UK
dc.citation.issn1687-630Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn1687-6121en_UK
dc.citation.volume2016en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.description.notesAdditional co-authors: Allan Hackshaw, Stephen Morris, Stephen W Duffy, Rosalind Raine, Jane Wardleen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationImperial College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationKing's College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Surreyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationGateshead Health NHS Foundation Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNottingham University Hospitals NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationLondon North West University Healthcare NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity Hospitals Coventry and Warwickshire NHS Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRoyal Surrey County Hospital NHS Foundation Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationImperial College Londonen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity College Londonen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000373009400001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84962770020en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1399372en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
dc.date.accepted2015-12-09en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2015-12-09en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-09-13en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcGregor, Lesley M|0000-0002-7093-1391en_UK
local.rioxx.authorvon Wagner, Christian|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAtkin, Wendy|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKralj-Hans, Ines|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHalloran, Stephen P|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHandley, Graham|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLogan, Richard F|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRainbow, Sandra|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSmith, Steve|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSnowball, Julia|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorThomas, Mary C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSmith, Samuel G|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorVart, Gemma|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHowe, Rosemary|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorCounsell, Nicholas|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-09-16en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2019-09-16|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename3670150.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1687-630Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
3670150.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.37 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.