Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/30534
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorFackrell, Kathrynen_UK
dc.contributor.authorStratmann, Lindaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorKennedy, Veronicaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMacDonald, Carolen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHodgson, Hilaryen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWray, Nicen_UK
dc.contributor.authorFarrell, Carolynen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMeadows, Mikeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSheldrake, Jacquelineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorByrom, Peteren_UK
dc.contributor.authorBaguley, David Men_UK
dc.contributor.authorKentish, Rosieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorChapman, Sarahen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMarriage, Josephineen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPhillips, Johnen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2019-12-13T01:01:48Z-
dc.date.available2019-12-13T01:01:48Z-
dc.date.issued2019-11en_UK
dc.identifier.othere032178en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/30534-
dc.description.abstractObjective To determine research priorities in hyperacusis that key stakeholders agree are the most important. Design/setting A priority setting partnership using two international surveys, and a UK prioritisation workshop, adhering to the six-staged methodology outlined by the James Lind Alliance. Participants People with lived experience of hyperacusis, parents/carers, family and friends, educational professionals and healthcare professionals who support and/or treat adults and children who experience hyperacusis, including but not limited to surgeons, audiologists, psychologists and hearing therapists. Methods The priority setting partnership was conducted from August 2017 to July 2018. An international identification survey asked respondents to submit any questions/uncertainties about hyperacusis. Uncertainties were categorised, refined and rephrased into representative indicative questions using thematic analysis techniques. These questions were verified as ‘unanswered’ through searches of current evidence. A second international survey asked respondents to vote for their top 10 priority questions. A shortlist of questions that represented votes from all stakeholder groups was prioritised into a top 10 at the final prioritisation workshop (UK). Results In the identification survey, 312 respondents submitted 2730 uncertainties. Of those uncertainties, 593 were removed as out of scope, and the remaining were refined into 85 indicative questions. None of the indicative questions had already been answered in research. The second survey collected votes from 327 respondents, which resulted in a shortlist of 28 representative questions for the final workshop. Consensus was reached on the top 10 priorities for future research, including identifying causes and underlying mechanisms, effective management and training for healthcare professionals. Conclusions These priorities were identified and shaped by people with lived experience, parents/carers and healthcare professionals, and as such are an essential resource for directing future research in hyperacusis. Researchers and funders should focus on addressing these priorities.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJ Publishing Groupen_UK
dc.relationFackrell K, Stratmann L, Kennedy V, MacDonald C, Hodgson H, Wray N, Farrell C, Meadows M, Sheldrake J, Byrom P, Baguley DM, Kentish R, Chapman S, Marriage J & Phillips J (2019) Identifying and prioritising unanswered research questions for people with hyperacusis: James Lind Alliance Hyperacusis Priority Setting Partnership. BMJ Open, 9 (11), Art. No.: e032178. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032178en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 Unported (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to copy, redistribute, remix, transform and build upon this work for any purpose, provided the original work is properly cited, a link to the licence is given, and indication of whether changes were made. See: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleIdentifying and prioritising unanswered research questions for people with hyperacusis: James Lind Alliance Hyperacusis Priority Setting Partnershipen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2019-032178en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid31753886en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Openen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-6055en_UK
dc.citation.volume9en_UK
dc.citation.issue11en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderNational Institute for Health Researchen_UK
dc.citation.date21/11/2019en_UK
dc.description.notesAdditional co-authors: Tracey Pollard, Helen Henshaw, Toto A Gronlund, Derek J Hoareen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBolton NHS Foundation Trusten_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationTinnitus and Hyperacusis Centreen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPeter Byrom Audiologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCochrane UKen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationChildren’s Hearing Evaluation and Amplification Resourceen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNorfolk and Norwich University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trusten_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000512774800284en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85075522327en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1492936en_UK
dc.date.accepted2019-10-08en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2019-10-08en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2019-12-12en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFackrell, Kathryn|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStratmann, Linda|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKennedy, Veronica|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMacDonald, Carol|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHodgson, Hilary|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWray, Nic|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorFarrell, Carolyn|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMeadows, Mike|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSheldrake, Jacqueline|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorByrom, Peter|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBaguley, David M|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorKentish, Rosie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorChapman, Sarah|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMarriage, Josephine|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPhillips, John|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2019-12-12en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2019-12-12|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamee032178.full.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2044-6055en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
e032178.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version981.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.