Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/31799
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorAndrews, Clareen_UK
dc.contributor.authorNettle, Danielen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLarriva, Mariaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorGillespie, Roberten_UK
dc.contributor.authorReichert, Sophieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBrilot, Ben O.en_UK
dc.contributor.authorBedford, Thomasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMonaghan, Paten_UK
dc.contributor.authorBateson, Melissaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSpencer, Karen A.en_UK
dc.date.accessioned2020-10-10T00:03:27Z-
dc.date.available2020-10-10T00:03:27Z-
dc.date.issued2017-09en_UK
dc.identifier.other171208en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/31799-
dc.description.abstractThe acute stress response functions to prioritize behavioural and physiological processes that maximize survival in the face of immediate threat. There is variation between individuals in the strength of the adult stress response that is of interest in both evolutionary biology and medicine. Age is an established source of this variation—stress responsiveness diminishes with increasing age in a range of species—but unexplained variation remains. Since individuals of the same chronological age may differ markedly in their pace of biological ageing, we asked whether biological age—measured here via erythrocyte telomere length—predicts variation in stress responsiveness in adult animals of the same chronological age. We studied two cohorts of European starlings in which we had previously manipulated the rate of biological ageing by experimentally altering the competition experienced by chicks in the fortnight following hatching. We predicted that individuals with greater developmental telomere attrition, and hence greater biological age, would show an attenuated corticosterone (CORT) response to an acute stressor when tested as adults. In both cohorts, we found that birds with greater developmental telomere attrition had lower peak CORT levels and a more negative change in CORT levels between 15 and 30 min following stress exposure. Our results, therefore, provide strong evidence that a measure of biological age explains individual variation in stress responsiveness: birds that were biologically older were less stress responsive. Our results provide a novel explanation for the phenomenon of developmental programming of the stress response: observed changes in stress physiology as a result of exposure to early-life adversity may reflect changes in ageing.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherThe Royal Societyen_UK
dc.relationAndrews C, Nettle D, Larriva M, Gillespie R, Reichert S, Brilot BO, Bedford T, Monaghan P, Bateson M & Spencer KA (2017) A marker of biological age explains individual variation in the strength of the adult stress response. Royal Society Open Science, 4 (9), Art. No.: 171208. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.171208en_UK
dc.rights© 2017 The Authors. Published by the Royal Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, which permits unrestricted use, provided the original author and source are credited.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjecttelomereen_UK
dc.subjectcorticosteroneen_UK
dc.subjectearly-life adversityen_UK
dc.subjectSturnus vulgarisen_UK
dc.subjectbiological ageen_UK
dc.subjectstress responseen_UK
dc.titleA marker of biological age explains individual variation in the strength of the adult stress responseen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1098/rsos.171208en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid28989794en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleRoyal Society Open Scienceen_UK
dc.citation.issn2054-5703en_UK
dc.citation.volume4en_UK
dc.citation.issue9en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilen_UK
dc.contributor.funderBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilen_UK
dc.contributor.funderBiotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilen_UK
dc.contributor.funderH2020 European Research Councilen_UK
dc.contributor.funderH2020 European Research Councilen_UK
dc.citation.date27/09/2017en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Sheffielden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Plymouthen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNewcastle Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of St Andrewsen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000412168900067en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85030260181en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1665265en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-7484-4447en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-9089-2599en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-7151-2773en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2430-0326en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0861-0191en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-2851-9379en_UK
dc.date.accepted2017-08-31en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2017-08-31en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2020-10-09en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorAndrews, Clare|0000-0002-7484-4447en_UK
local.rioxx.authorNettle, Daniel|0000-0001-9089-2599en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLarriva, Maria|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGillespie, Robert|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorReichert, Sophie|0000-0001-7151-2773en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBrilot, Ben O.|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBedford, Thomas|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMonaghan, Pat|0000-0003-2430-0326en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBateson, Melissa|0000-0002-0861-0191en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSpencer, Karen A.|0000-0002-2851-9379en_UK
local.rioxx.projectBB/J015091/1|Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268en_UK
local.rioxx.projectBB/J016446/1|Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268en_UK
local.rioxx.projectBB/J016292/1|Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268en_UK
local.rioxx.projectAdg268926|H2020 European Research Council|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectAdg666669|H2020 European Research Council|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2020-10-09en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2020-10-09|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenameAndrews-etal-RSOS-2017.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2054-5703en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
Andrews-etal-RSOS-2017.pdfFulltext - Published Version603.99 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.