Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33261
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Independent Effects of Attentional Gain Control and Competitive Interactions on Visual Stimulus Processing
Author(s): Keitel, Christian
Andersen, Søren K
Quigley, Cliodhna
Müller, Matthias M
Contact Email: christian.keitel@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: biased competition
human visual cortex
sensory gain control
steady-state visual evoked potentials
visual attention
Issue Date: Apr-2013
Date Deposited: 8-Sep-2021
Citation: Keitel C, Andersen SK, Quigley C & Müller MM (2013) Independent Effects of Attentional Gain Control and Competitive Interactions on Visual Stimulus Processing. Cerebral Cortex, 23 (4), pp. 940-946. https://doi.org/10.1093/cercor/bhs084
Abstract: Attention filters behaviorally relevant stimuli from the constant stream of sensory information comprising our environment. Research into underlying neural mechanisms in humans suggests that visual attention biases mutual suppression between stimuli resulting from competition for limited processing resources. As a consequence, processing of an attended stimulus is facilitated. This account makes 2 assumptions: 1) An attended stimulus is released from mutual suppression with competing stimuli and 2) an attended stimulus experiences greater gain in the presence of competing stimuli than when it is presented alone. Here, we tested these assumptions by recording frequency-tagged potentials elicited in early visual cortex that index stimulus-specific processing. We contrasted the processing of a given stimulus when its location was attended or unattended and in the presence or the absence of a nearby competing stimulus. At variance with previous findings, competition similarly suppressed processing of attended and unattended stimuli. Moreover, the magnitude of attentional gain was comparable in the presence or the absence of competing stimuli. We conclude that visuospatial selective attention does not directly modulate mutual suppression between stimuli but instead acts as a signal gain, which biases processing toward attended stimuli independent of competition.
DOI Link: 10.1093/cercor/bhs084
Rights: The publisher does not allow this work to be made publicly available in this Repository. Please use the Request a Copy feature at the foot of the Repository record to request a copy directly from the author. You can only request a copy if you wish to use this work for your own research or private study.
Licence URL(s): http://www.rioxx.net/licenses/under-embargo-all-rights-reserved

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
bhs084.pdfFulltext - Published Version5.57 MBAdobe PDFUnder Permanent Embargo    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.