Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33983
Appears in Collections: | History and Politics eTheses |
Title: | Does government dominate the legislative process? |
Other Titles: | A case-study of the Scottish Parliament |
Author(s): | MacGregor, Steven |
Supervisor(s): | Cairney, Paul |
Keywords: | Scottish Parliament Scotland Politics Parliaments Legislatures Legislation Bills Amendments Devolution Comparative studies Scottish politics Unicameral chamber Voting coalitions Parties SNP Legislative process UK Parliament Westminster Holyrood |
Issue Date: | Apr-2021 |
Publisher: | University of Stirling |
Abstract: | This thesis addresses parliamentary impact on government legislation using the Scottish Parliament as a case-study. It contributes to the ongoing debate about whether government dominates the legislative process, bringing a practitioner perspective. It makes the case for re-evaluating expectations about what government and parliament are seeking to achieve in the legislative process, demonstrating the need to take account of the type of legislation brought forward by government in interpreting parliament’s response. It highlights the importance of the choice of method in avoiding over– and under-stating parliamentary impact in the legislative process. It proposes re-evaluating the Scottish Parliament’s legislative performance, arguing that the legislative process in Scotland is largely defined by the sort of consensus politics which its proponents wished to see. This thesis addresses significant gaps in understanding of the Scottish Parliament’s legislative process in particular, but its focus on the role of parliament and government in the legislative process more generally should make it of interest to scholars in the wider legislative studies discipline. |
Type: | Thesis or Dissertation |
URI: | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/33983 |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Does Government dominate the legislative process - PhD - final for submission - 25 February 2022.pdf | 2.49 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.