Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34294
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorBostock, Johnen_UK
dc.contributor.authorAlbalat, Amayaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBunting, Stuarten_UK
dc.contributor.authorTurner, Warren Aen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMensah, Armah Dorcasen_UK
dc.contributor.authorLittle, David Cen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2022-05-11T00:03:40Z-
dc.date.available2022-05-11T00:03:40Z-
dc.date.issued2022-08-30en_UK
dc.identifier.other738315en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/34294-
dc.description.abstractAll-male tilapia stocks are widely used by farmers to supply both domestic and international markets with homogenous, large sized fish (500 g+). While a number of strategies are possible, hormonal treatment of fry with 17α-methyltestosterone (MT) is the most common method used by commercial farmers due to its low cost and ease of application. However, contrasting to its current widespread use the implications of MT in tilapia farming have raised concerns especially from public and environmental perspectives. Therefore, in this study we tested the impact of stocking a mixed-sex fast growing strain of Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) fry at high density and then grading out females at 4 or 8 weeks intervals during grow-out and compared final production with a standard MT-treated mono-sex system. From a production perspective, the strategies to remove females at 4 or 8 weeks were successful as no differences in harvest weight, survival and feed conversion rate were observed when compared to the MT-treated group. Similarly, no differences at harvest were obtained in terms of external appearance, Fulton's condition factor, gonadosomatic index, fillet yield, fat-somatic index and visceral-somatic index (%) between MT-monosex group and the groups where females were removed (4 or 8 weeks). However, a financial analysis of this approach showed that the additional costs (fry, feed and labour) involved in the mixed-sex strategy resulted in lower profits. This could be mitigated if a proportion of the removed females could be sold at a premium price as potential broodstock. In the model presented, sales of 13% of the removed females for broodfish at current Thai prices, or a premium of at least 8% for non-sex-reversed final product would be sufficient for the mixed-sex system to return a higher profit than the mono-sex system. The latter strategy could also enable further social licence through use of small fish in nutritional and outgrower initiatives.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevieren_UK
dc.relationBostock J, Albalat A, Bunting S, Turner WA, Mensah AD & Little DC (2022) Mixed-sex Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) can perform competitively with mono-sex stocks in cage production. Aquaculture, 557, Art. No.: 738315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738315en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectOreochromis niloticusen_UK
dc.subjectAquaculture systemsen_UK
dc.subjectHormonalen_UK
dc.subjectQualityen_UK
dc.subjectBioeconomic modellingen_UK
dc.subjectThailanden_UK
dc.titleMixed-sex Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus) can perform competitively with mono-sex stocks in cage productionen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.aquaculture.2022.738315en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleAquacultureen_UK
dc.citation.issn0044-8486en_UK
dc.citation.volume557en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusAM - Accepted Manuscripten_UK
dc.contributor.funderJ Sainsbury plcen_UK
dc.citation.date04/05/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationBunting Aquacultureen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNam Sai Farms Co. Ltden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationInstitute of Aquacultureen_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85130203915en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid1811904en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-0723-3929en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-8606-2995en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-6095-3191en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-04-28en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-04-28en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2022-05-10en_UK
rioxxterms.apcpaiden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionAMen_UK
local.rioxx.authorBostock, John|0000-0002-0723-3929en_UK
local.rioxx.authorAlbalat, Amaya|0000-0002-8606-2995en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBunting, Stuart|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorTurner, Warren A|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMensah, Armah Dorcas|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorLittle, David C|0000-0002-6095-3191en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|J Sainsbury plc|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2022-05-10en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-05-10|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0044848622004318-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0044-8486en_UK
Appears in Collections:Aquaculture Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0044848622004318-main.pdfFulltext - Accepted Version2.21 MBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.