Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34489
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Lorenc, Ava | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Greaves, Colin | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Duda, Joan | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Brett, Jo | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Matheson, Lauren | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Fulton-Lieuw, Tessa | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Secher, Denis | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Rhodes, Pat | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Ozakinci, Gozde | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Nankivell, Paul | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Mehanna, Hisham | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Jepson, Marcus | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2022-07-07T00:00:35Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2022-07-07T00:00:35Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-07-04 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/34489 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective The objective of this work was to explore head and neck cancer (HNC) patients' and their family members' views on acceptability and feasibility of patient-initiated follow-up (PIFU), including concerns and anticipated benefits. Methods Patients were recruited from UK HNC clinics, support groups and advocacy groups. They completed a survey (n = 144) and/or qualitative interview (n = 30), three with a family member. Qualitative data were analysed thematically, quantitative data using descriptive statistics. Results Preference for follow-up care in HNC was complex and individual. Many patients thought PIFU could beneficially reallocate health care resources and encourage self-management. Patients' main concerns with PIFU were losing the reassurance of regular clinic appointments and addressing mental well-being needs within PIFU, possibly using peer support. Patients were concerned about their ability to detect recurrence due to lack of expertise and information. They emphasised the importance of a reliable, direct and easy urgent appointment service and of feeling supported and heard by clinicians. Patients believed family and friends need support. Conclusion PIFU may be feasible and acceptable for certain HNC patients, providing it addresses support for mental well-being, provides quick, reliable and direct clinician access and information on “red flag” symptoms, and ensures patients and their caregivers feel supported. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | Wiley | en_UK |
dc.relation | Lorenc A, Greaves C, Duda J, Brett J, Matheson L, Fulton-Lieuw T, Secher D, Rhodes P, Ozakinci G, Nankivell P, Mehanna H & Jepson M (2022) Exploring the views of patients' and their family about patient-initiated follow-up in head and neck cancer: a mixed methods study. European Journal of Cancer Care. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecc.13641 | en_UK |
dc.rights | © 2022 The Authors. European Journal of Cancer Care published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.subject | head and neck cancer | en_UK |
dc.subject | patient education | en_UK |
dc.subject | patient information | en_UK |
dc.subject | psychological | en_UK |
dc.subject | supportive care | en_UK |
dc.subject | users | en_UK |
dc.title | Exploring the views of patients' and their family about patient-initiated follow-up in head and neck cancer: a mixed methods study | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1111/ecc.13641 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 35789510 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | European Journal of Cancer Care | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 1365-2354 | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 0961-5423 | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | NIHR National Institute for Health Research | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 04/07/2022 | en_UK |
dc.description.notes | Output Status: Forthcoming/Available Online | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Bristol | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Oxford Brookes University | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Oxford Brookes University | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Independent | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Independent | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Birmingham | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Bristol | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000820493900001 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85133814480 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 1820608 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-5869-3274 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2022-06-06 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-06-06 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2022-07-06 | en_UK |
dc.relation.funderproject | PET-CT guided, symptom-based, patient initiated surveillance versus clinical follow-up in advanced head neck cancer (PET NECK 2) | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.type | Journal Article/Review | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Lorenc, Ava| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Greaves, Colin| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Duda, Joan| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Brett, Jo| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Matheson, Lauren| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Fulton-Lieuw, Tessa| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Secher, Denis| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Rhodes, Pat| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Ozakinci, Gozde|0000-0001-5869-3274 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Nankivell, Paul| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Mehanna, Hisham| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Jepson, Marcus| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | Project ID unknown|National Institute for Health Research|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2022-07-06 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2022-07-06| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | Lorenc-etal-EJCC-2022.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 1365-2354 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Lorenc-etal-EJCC-2022.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 1.11 MB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.