Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35462
Appears in Collections:History and Politics eTheses
Title: Lawful sovereignty: the political criminalisation and decriminalisation of Jacobitism, 1688–1788
Author(s): Cunningham, Calum Edward
Supervisor(s): Mann, Alastair J.
Macleod, Emma
Keywords: Jacobitism
Jacobites
political history and studies
ideology
criminalisation
decriminalisation
crime and punishment
legal history and studies
nation-state building
three kingdoms
culture studies
eighteenth century and enlightenment studies
Issue Date: 1-Apr-2023
Publisher: University of Stirling
Abstract: Following the Revolution of 1688–89 and the exile of the Catholic Stuarts, Jacobitism was a socio-political alternative to the constitutional and religious settlements established in its aftermath. Propaganda campaigns favouring the royal dynasties at the centre of this ideological conflict remained fundamental as it developed. The Jacobites’ failure to recognise the Williamite and Hanoverian monarchs, regimes and the laws enacted in their names resulted in a swathe of mass criminality. It included considerable sedition and a near-universal association with high treason. This political irritant continued to subsist, and in the wake of the Treaty of Union of 1707, the Jacobite movement became the ideological challenger to the nascent British state. This thesis examines the Scottish, English (at times, Irish) and British states’ responses to the incendiary Jacobite threat beyond the battlefield. Successive administrations’ actions formed an overarching programme of political criminalisation and decriminalisation that lasted for around one hundred years, from 1688 to 1788. It looks at four thematic aspects of state weaponry employed on the Jacobites across several decades: ideology, policy, legislation and punishment. Doing so reveals that these mechanisms were inextricably entwined, and research has focused on materials relating to these themes, primarily those of a political and legislative nature. They include state papers and cabinet correspondence, policy-related memoranda, statutory public legislation and applicable punishment data. It assesses the policy formation, implementation and reformation required to tackle the ‘Jacobite problem’. The institution of a formidable legislative framework shows that the authorities regarded it as a severe danger. Their approach towards punishment involved a delicate balancing act between affording much clemency alongside a raft of ruthless retribution and cautionary warnings. The results suggest a significant amount of politico-legal precedent and institutional memory influenced the collective administrative response to, but also the evolution of, the Jacobite movement. It argues that a state-sanctioned political criminalisation programme was essential to obliterate all facets of Jacobitism.
Type: Thesis or Dissertation
URI: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35462

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
2023CunninghamPhD.pdf7.66 MBAdobe PDFUnder Embargo until 2027-01-01    Request a copy

Note: If any of the files in this item are currently embargoed, you can request a copy directly from the author by clicking the padlock icon above. However, this facility is dependent on the depositor still being contactable at their original email address.



This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.