Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/35728
Appears in Collections:Faculty of Health Sciences and Sport Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Interventions to increase vaccination against COVID-19, influenza and pertussis during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Author(s): Razai, Mohammad S
Mansour, Rania
Goldsmith, Lucy
Freeman, Samuel
Mason-Apps, Charlotte
Ravindran, Pahalavi
Kooner, Pavan
Berendes, Sima
Morris, Joan
Majeed, Azeem
Ussher, Michael
Hargreaves, Sally
Oakeshott, Pippa
Contact Email: aileen.paton@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: Vaccine hesitancy
strategies
maternal immunization
vaccine confidence
public policy
antenatal care
maternal health
Issue Date: Dec-2023
Date Deposited: 16-Feb-2024
Citation: Razai MS, Mansour R, Goldsmith L, Freeman S, Mason-Apps C, Ravindran P, Kooner P, Berendes S, Morris J, Majeed A, Ussher M, Hargreaves S & Oakeshott P (2023) Interventions to increase vaccination against COVID-19, influenza and pertussis during pregnancy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. <i>Journal of Travel Medicine</i>, 30 (8), Art. No.: taad138. https://doi.org/10.1093/jtm/taad138
Abstract: Background: Pregnant women and their babies face significant risks from three vaccine-preventable diseases: COVID-19, influenza, and pertussis. However, despite these vaccines' proven safety and effectiveness, vaccine uptake during pregnancy remains low. Methods: We conducted a systematic review (PROSPERO CRD42023399488; January 2012 – December 2022 following PRISMA guidelines) of interventions to increase COVID-19/influenza/pertussis vaccination in pregnancy. We searched nine databases, including grey literature. Two independent investigators extracted data; discrepancies were resolved by consensus. Meta-analyses were conducted using random-effects models to estimate pooled effect sizes. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 statistics. Results: Out of 2681 articles, we identified 39 relevant studies (n=168,262 participants) across nine countries. Fifteen studies (39%) were randomised controlled trials (RCTs); the remainder were observational cohort, quality-improvement or cross-sectional studies. The quality of 18% (7/39) was strong. Pooled results of interventions to increase influenza vaccine uptake (18 effect estimates from 12 RCTs) showed the interventions were effective but had a small effect (Risk ratio = 1.07, 95%CI 1.03, 1.13). However, pooled results of interventions to increase pertussis vaccine uptake (10 effect estimates from six RCTs) showed no clear benefit (Risk ratio = 0.98, 95%CI 0.94, 1.03). There were no relevant RCTs for COVID-19. Interventions addressed the “three Ps”: patient-, provider- and policy-level strategies. At patient level, clear recommendations from healthcare professionals backed by text reminders/written information were strongly associated with increased vaccine uptake, especially tailored face-to-face interventions, which addressed women’s concerns, dispelled myths and highlighted the benefits. Provider-level interventions included educating healthcare professionals about vaccines’ safety and effectiveness and reminders to offer vaccinations routinely. Policy-level interventions included financial incentives, mandatory vaccination data fields in electronic health records, and ensuring easy availability of vaccinations. Conclusions: Interventions had a small effect on increasing influenza vaccination. Training healthcare providers to promote vaccinations during pregnancy is crucial, and could be enhanced by utilising mobile health technologies.
DOI Link: 10.1093/jtm/taad138
Rights: This article is available under the Creative Commons CC-BY-NC license and permits non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
taad138.pdfFulltext - Published Version1.7 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.