Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36471
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles
Peer Review Status: Refereed
Title: Optimising species detection probability and sampling effort in lake fish eDNA surveys
Author(s): Sellers, Graham S
Jerde, Christopher L
Harper, Lynsey R
Benucci, Marco
Di Muri, Cristina
Li, Jianlong
Peirson, Graeme
Walsh, Kerry
Hatton-Ellis, Tristan
Duncan, Willie
Duguid, Alistair
Ottewell, Dave
Willby, Nigel
Law, Alan
Bean, Colin W
Contact Email: n.j.willby@stir.ac.uk
Keywords: eDNA metabarcoding
meta-analysis
sampling effort
species detection
Issue Date: 24-Jul-2024
Date Deposited: 11-Nov-2024
Citation: Sellers GS, Jerde CL, Harper LR, Benucci M, Di Muri C, Li J, Peirson G, Walsh K, Hatton-Ellis T, Duncan W, Duguid A, Ottewell D, Willby N, Law A & Bean CW (2024) Optimising species detection probability and sampling effort in lake fish eDNA surveys. <i>Metabarcoding and Metagenomics</i>, 8, Art. No.: e104655. https://doi.org/10.3897/mbmg.8.104655
Abstract: Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is transforming biodiversity monitoring in aquatic environments. Such an approach has been developed and deployed for monitoring lake fish communities in Great Britain, where the method has repeatedly shown a comparable or better performance than conventional approaches. Previous analyses indicated that 20 water samples per lake are sufficient to reliably estimate fish species richness, but it is unclear how reduced eDNA sampling effort affects richness, or other biodiversity estimates and metrics. As the number of samples strongly influences the cost of monitoring programmes, it is essential that sampling effort is optimised for a specific monitoring objective. The aim of this project was to explore the effect of reduced eDNA sampling effort on biodiversity metrics (namely species richness and community composition) using algorithmic and statistical resampling techniques of a data set from 101 lakes, covering a wide spectrum of lake types and ecological quality. The results showed that reliable estimation of lake fish species richness could, in fact, usually be achieved with a much lower number of samples. For example, in almost 90% of lakes, 95% of complete fish richness could be detected with only 10 water samples, regardless of lake area. Similarly, other measures of alpha and beta-diversity were not greatly affected by a reduction in sample size from 20 to 10 samples. We also found that there is no significant difference in detected species richness between shoreline and offshore sampling transects, allowing for simplified field logistics. This could potentially allow the effective sampling of a larger number of lakes within a given monitoring budget. However, rare species were more often missed with fewer samples, with potential implications for monitoring of invasive or endangered species. These results should inform the design of eDNA sampling strategies, so that these can be optimised to achieve specific monitoring goals.
DOI Link: 10.3897/mbmg.8.104655
Rights: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY 4.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Notes: Additional authors: Ian J. Winfield, Daniel S. Read, Lori Lawson Handley, Bernd Hänfling
Licence URL(s): http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
MBMG_article_104655_en_1.pdfFulltext - Published Version3.91 MBAdobe PDFView/Open



This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.