Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36478
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorWhite, P Lewisen_UK
dc.contributor.authorHibbitts, Samantha Jen_UK
dc.contributor.authorPerry, Michael Den_UK
dc.contributor.authorGreen, Julieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorStirling, Emmaen_UK
dc.contributor.authorWoodford, Lukeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMcNay, Graemeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorStevenson, Rossen_UK
dc.contributor.authorBarnes, Rosemary Aen_UK
dc.contributor.editorDiekema, D Jen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2024-11-15T01:02:28Z-
dc.date.available2024-11-15T01:02:28Z-
dc.date.issued2014-10en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/36478-
dc.description.abstractNonculture-based tests are gaining popularity in the diagnosis of invasive fungal disease (IFD), but PCR is excluded from disease-defining criteria because of limited standardization and a lack of commercial assays. Commercial PCR assays may have a standardized methodology while providing quality assurance. The detection of PCR products by a surface-enhanced Raman scattering (SERS) assay potentially provides superior analytical sensitivity and multiplexing capacity compared to that of real-time PCR. Using this approach, the RenDx Fungiplex assay was developed to detect Candida and Aspergillus. Analytical and clinical evaluations of the assay were undertaken using extraction methods according to European Aspergillus PCR Initiative (EAPCRI) recommendations. A total of 195 previously extracted samples (133 plasma, 49 serum, and 13 whole blood) from 112 patients (29 with proven/probable IFD) were tested. The 95% limit of detection of Candida and Aspergillus was 200 copies per reaction, with an overall reproducibility of 92.1% for detecting 20 input copies per PCR, and 89.8% for the nucleic acid extraction–PCR-SERS process for detecting fungal burdens of <20 genome equivalents per sample. A clinical evaluation showed that assay positivity significantly correlated with IFD (P < 0.0001). The sensitivity of the assay was 82.8% and was similar for both Candida (80.0%) and Aspergillus (85.7%). The specificity was 87.5% and was increased (97.5%) by using a multiple (≥2 samples) PCR-positive threshold. In summary, the RenDx Fungiplex assay is a PCR-SERS assay for diagnosing IFD and demonstrates promising clinical performance on a variety of samples. This was a retrospective clinical evaluation, and performance is likely to be enhanced through a prospective analysis of clinical validity and by determining clinical utility.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherAmerican Society for Microbiologyen_UK
dc.relationWhite PL, Hibbitts SJ, Perry MD, Green J, Stirling E, Woodford L, McNay G, Stevenson R & Barnes RA (2014) Evaluation of a Commercially Developed Semiautomated PCR–Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Assay for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Disease. Diekema DJ (Editor) <i>Journal of Clinical Microbiology</i>, 52 (10), pp. 3536-3543. https://doi.org/10.1128/jcm.01135-14en_UK
dc.rights© 2014 American Society for Microbiology. The authors have paid a fee to allow immediate free access to this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdfen_UK
dc.titleEvaluation of a Commercially Developed Semiautomated PCR–Surface-Enhanced Raman Scattering Assay for Diagnosis of Invasive Fungal Diseaseen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1128/jcm.01135-14en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid25031443en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleJournal of Clinical Microbiologyen_UK
dc.citation.issn1098-660Xen_UK
dc.citation.issn0095-1137en_UK
dc.citation.volume52en_UK
dc.citation.issue10en_UK
dc.citation.spage3536en_UK
dc.citation.epage3543en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderPublic Health Walesen_UK
dc.author.emailluke.woodford@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date21/12/2020en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPublic Health Walesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCardiff Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPublic Health Walesen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRenishaw Diagnostics Ltden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRenishaw Diagnostics Ltden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRenishaw Diagnostics Ltden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRenishaw Diagnostics Ltden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationRenishaw Diagnostics Ltden_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationCardiff Universityen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000342371700004en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-84907168914en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2014469en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-2530-2120en_UK
dc.date.accepted2014-07-05en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2014-07-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2024-11-01en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.typeJournal Article/Reviewen_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorWhite, P Lewis|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorHibbitts, Samantha J|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorPerry, Michael D|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorGreen, Julie|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStirling, Emma|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorWoodford, Luke|0000-0003-2530-2120en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMcNay, Graeme|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorStevenson, Ross|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorBarnes, Rosemary A|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|Public Health Wales|en_UK
local.rioxx.contributorDiekema, D J|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2024-11-14en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttps://storre.stir.ac.uk/STORREEndUserLicence.pdf|2024-11-14|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamewhite-et-al-2020-evaluation-of-a-commercially-developed-semiautomated-pcr-surface-enhanced-raman-scattering-assay-for.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source1098-660Xen_UK
Appears in Collections:Biological and Environmental Sciences Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
white-et-al-2020-evaluation-of-a-commercially-developed-semiautomated-pcr-surface-enhanced-raman-scattering-assay-for.pdfFulltext - Published Version742.68 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.