Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36830
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorShepherd, Leeen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO'Carroll, Ronan E.en_UK
dc.contributor.authorFerguson, Eamonnen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-11T01:42:50Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-11T01:42:50Z-
dc.date.issued2023-01en_UK
dc.identifier.other115545en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/36830-
dc.description.abstractRationale Family, and sometimes longstanding friends, have considerable influence over organ donation, through agreeing or disagreeing to the donation of a deceased individual's organs. To date, most research has been undertaken within opt-in systems. Objective This study advances on previous research by assessing next-of-kin approval under opt-out legislation. We tested whether next-of-kin approval varies when the deceased is a registered donor (opted-in), registered non-donor (opted-out) or has not registered a decision under an opt-out policy (deemed consent). We also tested if the deceased's wishes influenced next-of-kin approval through relatives anticipating regret for not donating and feelings of uncertainty. Finally, we assessed whether next-of-kin's own beliefs about organ donation influenced whether they followed the deceased's wishes. Methods Participants (N = 848) living in a country with opt-out legislation (Wales, UK) were asked to imagine a relative had died under an opt-out system and decided if their relatives' organs should be donated. Participants were randomly allocated to imagine the deceased had either (i) opted-in, (ii) opted-out or (iii) not registered a decision (deemed consent). The outcome variable was next-of-kin approval, with uncertainty and anticipated regret as potential mediators and next-of-kin's beliefs about organ donation as moderators. Results Next-of-kin approval was lower when the deceased had opted-out than under deemed consent. This was due to next-of-kin anticipating more regret for not donating under deemed consent than opt-out. Further analyses revealed the deceased's wishes influence next-of-kin approval, via anticipated regret, when next-of-kin did not hold negative beliefs about organ donation. Conclusions The deceased's wishes were less likely to be followed when next-of-kin had negative beliefs towards donation. Developing large-scale campaigns to improve these beliefs in the general public should make people more likely to follow the deceased's wishes. As a result, these campaigns should improve the availability of donor organs.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherElsevier BVen_UK
dc.relationShepherd L, O'Carroll RE & Ferguson E (2023) Assessing the factors that influence the donation of a deceased family member's organs in an opt-out system for organ donation. <i>Social Science & Medicine</i>, 317, Art. No.: 115545. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115545en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons CC-BY license, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. You are not required to obtain permission to reuse this article.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/en_UK
dc.subjectNext-of-kinen_UK
dc.subjectOrgan donationen_UK
dc.subjectTransplantationen_UK
dc.subjectAffective attitudesen_UK
dc.subjectPerceived benefitsen_UK
dc.subjectAnticipated regreten_UK
dc.subjectUncertaintyen_UK
dc.subjectWales (UK)en_UK
dc.titleAssessing the factors that influence the donation of a deceased family member's organs in an opt-out system for organ donationen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115545en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid36436261en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleSocial Science and Medicineen_UK
dc.citation.issn0277-9536en_UK
dc.citation.issn0277-9536en_UK
dc.citation.volume317en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderThe British Academyen_UK
dc.author.emailronan.ocarroll@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date17/11/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNorthumbria Universityen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Nottinghamen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000974615800001en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85145589141en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2075839en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0003-0946-6336en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-11-13en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-11-13en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2025-01-28en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorShepherd, Lee|0000-0003-0946-6336en_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Carroll, Ronan E.|0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorFerguson, Eamonn|en_UK
local.rioxx.projectProject ID unknown|The British Academy|en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2025-01-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/|2025-01-28|en_UK
local.rioxx.filename1-s2.0-S0277953622008516-main.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source0277-9536en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
1-s2.0-S0277953622008516-main.pdfFulltext - Published Version797.7 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.