Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36831
Full metadata record
DC Field | Value | Language |
---|---|---|
dc.contributor.author | Kotzur, Marie | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Macdonald, Sara | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | O'Carroll, Ronan E | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | O'Connor, Rory C | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Irvine, Audrey | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Steele, Robert J C | en_UK |
dc.contributor.author | Robb, Kathryn A | en_UK |
dc.date.accessioned | 2025-03-11T01:43:32Z | - |
dc.date.available | 2025-03-11T01:43:32Z | - |
dc.date.issued | 2022-09 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.other | e062738 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.uri | http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36831 | - |
dc.description.abstract | Objective Colorectal screening using faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) can save lives if the people invited participate. In Scotland, most people intend to complete a FIT but this is not reflected in uptake rates. Planning interventions can bridge this intention-behaviour gap. To develop a tool supporting people willing to do colorectal screening with planning to complete a FIT, this study aimed to identify frequently experienced barriers and solutions to these barriers. Design This is a cross-sectional study. Setting Participants were recruited through the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme to complete a mailed questionnaire. Participants The study included 2387 participants who had completed a FIT (mean age 65 years, 40% female) and 359 participants who had not completed a FIT but were inclined to do so (mean age 63 years, 39% female). Outcome measures The questionnaire assessed frequency of endorsement of colorectal screening barriers and solutions. Results Participants who had not completed a FIT endorsed significantly more barriers than those who had completed a FIT, when demographic, health and behavioural covariates were held constant (F(1,2053)=13.40, p<0.001, partial η2=0.01). Participants who completed a FIT endorsed significantly more solutions than those who did not (U=301 585.50, z=−3.21, p<0.001, r=0.06). This difference became insignificant when covariates were controlled. Participants agreed on the most common barriers and solutions regardless of screening history. Barriers included procrastination, forgetting, fear of the test result, screening anxiety, disgust and low self-efficacy. Solutions included hand-washing, doing the FIT in private, reading the FIT instructions, benefit of early detection, feelings of responsibility, high self-efficacy and seeing oneself as a person who looks after one’s health. Conclusion This survey identified six barriers and seven solutions as key content to include in the development of a planning tool for colorectal screening using the FIT. Participatory research is required to codesign an engaging and accessible planning tool. | en_UK |
dc.language.iso | en | en_UK |
dc.publisher | BMJ | en_UK |
dc.relation | Kotzur M, Macdonald S, O'Carroll RE, O'Connor RC, Irvine A, Steele RJC & Robb KA (2022) What are common barriers and helpful solutions to colorectal cancer screening? A cross-sectional survey to develop intervention content for a planning support tool. <i>BMJ Open</i>, 12, Art. No.: e062738. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062738 | en_UK |
dc.rights | This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/. | en_UK |
dc.rights.uri | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ | en_UK |
dc.title | What are common barriers and helpful solutions to colorectal cancer screening? A cross-sectional survey to develop intervention content for a planning support tool | en_UK |
dc.type | Journal Article | en_UK |
dc.identifier.doi | 10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062738 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.pmid | 36691140 | en_UK |
dc.citation.jtitle | BMJ Open | en_UK |
dc.citation.issn | 2044-6055 | en_UK |
dc.citation.volume | 12 | en_UK |
dc.citation.publicationstatus | Published | en_UK |
dc.citation.peerreviewed | Refereed | en_UK |
dc.type.status | VoR - Version of Record | en_UK |
dc.contributor.funder | CSO Chief Scientist Office | en_UK |
dc.author.email | ronan.ocarroll@stir.ac.uk | en_UK |
dc.citation.date | 05/09/2022 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Glasgow | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Glasgow | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | Psychology | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Glasgow | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | NHS Tayside | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Dundee | en_UK |
dc.contributor.affiliation | University of Glasgow | en_UK |
dc.identifier.isi | WOS:000852862800036 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.scopusid | 2-s2.0-85138541640 | en_UK |
dc.identifier.wtid | 2075818 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0001-6921-5075 | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-5130-291X | en_UK |
dc.contributor.orcid | 0000-0002-1672-0411 | en_UK |
dc.date.accepted | 2022-08-05 | en_UK |
dcterms.dateAccepted | 2022-08-05 | en_UK |
dc.date.filedepositdate | 2025-01-28 | en_UK |
dc.relation.funderproject | Increasing uptake of bowel cancer screening: development of a planning support tool | en_UK |
dc.relation.funderref | HIPS/17/23 | en_UK |
rioxxterms.apc | not required | en_UK |
rioxxterms.version | VoR | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Kotzur, Marie|0000-0001-6921-5075 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Macdonald, Sara| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | O'Carroll, Ronan E|0000-0002-5130-291X | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | O'Connor, Rory C| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Irvine, Audrey| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Steele, Robert J C| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.author | Robb, Kathryn A|0000-0002-1672-0411 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.project | HIPS/17/23|Chief Scientist Office|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000589 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate | 2025-01-28 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.licence | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2025-01-28| | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filename | e062738.full.pdf | en_UK |
local.rioxx.filecount | 1 | en_UK |
local.rioxx.source | 2044-6055 | en_UK |
Appears in Collections: | Psychology Journal Articles |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
e062738.full.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 443.59 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.