Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item: http://hdl.handle.net/1893/36831
Full metadata record
DC FieldValueLanguage
dc.contributor.authorKotzur, Marieen_UK
dc.contributor.authorMacdonald, Saraen_UK
dc.contributor.authorO'Carroll, Ronan Een_UK
dc.contributor.authorO'Connor, Rory Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorIrvine, Audreyen_UK
dc.contributor.authorSteele, Robert J Cen_UK
dc.contributor.authorRobb, Kathryn Aen_UK
dc.date.accessioned2025-03-11T01:43:32Z-
dc.date.available2025-03-11T01:43:32Z-
dc.date.issued2022-09en_UK
dc.identifier.othere062738en_UK
dc.identifier.urihttp://hdl.handle.net/1893/36831-
dc.description.abstractObjective Colorectal screening using faecal immunochemical tests (FITs) can save lives if the people invited participate. In Scotland, most people intend to complete a FIT but this is not reflected in uptake rates. Planning interventions can bridge this intention-behaviour gap. To develop a tool supporting people willing to do colorectal screening with planning to complete a FIT, this study aimed to identify frequently experienced barriers and solutions to these barriers. Design This is a cross-sectional study. Setting Participants were recruited through the Scottish Bowel Screening Programme to complete a mailed questionnaire. Participants The study included 2387 participants who had completed a FIT (mean age 65 years, 40% female) and 359 participants who had not completed a FIT but were inclined to do so (mean age 63 years, 39% female). Outcome measures The questionnaire assessed frequency of endorsement of colorectal screening barriers and solutions. Results Participants who had not completed a FIT endorsed significantly more barriers than those who had completed a FIT, when demographic, health and behavioural covariates were held constant (F(1,2053)=13.40, p<0.001, partial η2=0.01). Participants who completed a FIT endorsed significantly more solutions than those who did not (U=301 585.50, z=−3.21, p<0.001, r=0.06). This difference became insignificant when covariates were controlled. Participants agreed on the most common barriers and solutions regardless of screening history. Barriers included procrastination, forgetting, fear of the test result, screening anxiety, disgust and low self-efficacy. Solutions included hand-washing, doing the FIT in private, reading the FIT instructions, benefit of early detection, feelings of responsibility, high self-efficacy and seeing oneself as a person who looks after one’s health. Conclusion This survey identified six barriers and seven solutions as key content to include in the development of a planning tool for colorectal screening using the FIT. Participatory research is required to codesign an engaging and accessible planning tool.en_UK
dc.language.isoenen_UK
dc.publisherBMJen_UK
dc.relationKotzur M, Macdonald S, O'Carroll RE, O'Connor RC, Irvine A, Steele RJC & Robb KA (2022) What are common barriers and helpful solutions to colorectal cancer screening? A cross-sectional survey to develop intervention content for a planning support tool. <i>BMJ Open</i>, 12, Art. No.: e062738. https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062738en_UK
dc.rightsThis is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.en_UK
dc.rights.urihttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/en_UK
dc.titleWhat are common barriers and helpful solutions to colorectal cancer screening? A cross-sectional survey to develop intervention content for a planning support toolen_UK
dc.typeJournal Articleen_UK
dc.identifier.doi10.1136/bmjopen-2022-062738en_UK
dc.identifier.pmid36691140en_UK
dc.citation.jtitleBMJ Openen_UK
dc.citation.issn2044-6055en_UK
dc.citation.volume12en_UK
dc.citation.publicationstatusPublisheden_UK
dc.citation.peerreviewedRefereeden_UK
dc.type.statusVoR - Version of Recorden_UK
dc.contributor.funderCSO Chief Scientist Officeen_UK
dc.author.emailronan.ocarroll@stir.ac.uken_UK
dc.citation.date05/09/2022en_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationPsychologyen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationNHS Taysideen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Dundeeen_UK
dc.contributor.affiliationUniversity of Glasgowen_UK
dc.identifier.isiWOS:000852862800036en_UK
dc.identifier.scopusid2-s2.0-85138541640en_UK
dc.identifier.wtid2075818en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0001-6921-5075en_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
dc.contributor.orcid0000-0002-1672-0411en_UK
dc.date.accepted2022-08-05en_UK
dcterms.dateAccepted2022-08-05en_UK
dc.date.filedepositdate2025-01-28en_UK
dc.relation.funderprojectIncreasing uptake of bowel cancer screening: development of a planning support toolen_UK
dc.relation.funderrefHIPS/17/23en_UK
rioxxterms.apcnot requireden_UK
rioxxterms.versionVoRen_UK
local.rioxx.authorKotzur, Marie|0000-0001-6921-5075en_UK
local.rioxx.authorMacdonald, Sara|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Carroll, Ronan E|0000-0002-5130-291Xen_UK
local.rioxx.authorO'Connor, Rory C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorIrvine, Audrey|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorSteele, Robert J C|en_UK
local.rioxx.authorRobb, Kathryn A|0000-0002-1672-0411en_UK
local.rioxx.projectHIPS/17/23|Chief Scientist Office|http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000589en_UK
local.rioxx.freetoreaddate2025-01-28en_UK
local.rioxx.licencehttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|2025-01-28|en_UK
local.rioxx.filenamee062738.full.pdfen_UK
local.rioxx.filecount1en_UK
local.rioxx.source2044-6055en_UK
Appears in Collections:Psychology Journal Articles

Files in This Item:
File Description SizeFormat 
e062738.full.pdfFulltext - Published Version443.59 kBAdobe PDFView/Open


This item is protected by original copyright



A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License Creative Commons

Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.

The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/

If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.