Please use this identifier to cite or link to this item:
http://hdl.handle.net/1893/29148
Appears in Collections: | Economics Journal Articles |
Peer Review Status: | Unrefereed |
Title: | Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option: Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014) |
Author(s): | Myrseth, Kristian Ove R Wollbrant, Conny |
Keywords: | social dilemma cooperation intuition cognitive conflict self-control |
Issue Date: | May-2015 |
Date Deposited: | 2-Feb-2019 |
Citation: | Myrseth KOR & Wollbrant C (2015) Less cognitive conflict does not imply choice of the default option: Commentary on Kieslich and Hilbig (2014). Commentary on: Kieslich, P. J., & Hilbig, B. E. (2014). Cognitive conflict in social dilemmas: An analysis of response dynamics. Judgment and Decision Making, 9(6), 510–522.. Judgment and Decision Making, 10 (3), pp. 277-279. http://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.pdf |
Abstract: | Kieslich and Hilbig (2014) employ a mouse-tracking technique to measure decision conflict in social dilemmas. They report that defectors exhibit more conflict than do cooperators. They infer that cooperation thus is the reflexive, default behavior. We argue, however, that their analysis fails to discriminate between reflexive versus cognitively controlled behavioral responses. This is because cognitive conflict can emanate from resisting impulse successfully—or unsuccessfully. |
URL: | http://journal.sjdm.org/14/141214/jdm141214.pdf |
Rights: | Copyright: © 2015. The authors license this article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
Licence URL(s): | http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
Files in This Item:
File | Description | Size | Format | |
---|---|---|---|---|
Myrseth_Wollbrant_2015_JDM.pdf | Fulltext - Published Version | 64.73 kB | Adobe PDF | View/Open |
This item is protected by original copyright |
A file in this item is licensed under a Creative Commons License
Items in the Repository are protected by copyright, with all rights reserved, unless otherwise indicated.
The metadata of the records in the Repository are available under the CC0 public domain dedication: No Rights Reserved https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/
If you believe that any material held in STORRE infringes copyright, please contact library@stir.ac.uk providing details and we will remove the Work from public display in STORRE and investigate your claim.